Taiwan’s shameful treatment of migrant workers continues to make international headlines, the most recent being a Thomson Reuters Foundation report last week that pregnant workers often face a choice between getting fired and an abortion.
The woman featured in the story chose abortion, since losing her job would mean she had to pay her own ticket home and a contract termination fee, while also being in debt for placement fees to her broker. Moreover, she had to pay back a New Year hongbao (紅包, red envelope containing money) to her employer.
Of course, this is illegal in Taiwan, but migrant workers are often under the thumb of unscrupulous brokers who do not inform them of their rights and usually side with employers.
And as the article said: “Enforcement is inconsistent at best.”
The brokers know the system in and out, and how to get away with it. They remain the biggest problem in the mistreatment of migrant workers that has become a blight on Taiwan’s human rights record, and is the reason why there have been protests calling for the abolition of the broker system.
There are good brokers, and they do make the process for employers and workers much easier, but something needs to be done so that the bad ones do not run unchecked like this.
The government’s direct-hiring program is pretty much useless, as it is too much of a hassle for employers; it is the broker system that needs to be fixed directly.
Unfortunately, that would just address the financial and legal issues, as workplace discrimination against pregnant women is not limited to migrant workers.
As a Taipei Times report in March said: “Sexist stereotypes that women are more well-suited to domesticity and that their work performance will suffer after they get married or have a child can result in employers taking matters into their own hands, by withholding professional opportunities, promotions and mentorship.”
A Ministry of Labor report in August last year showed that half of its workplace gender discrimination cases that year were related to pregnancy discrimination — namely, firing women for seemingly unrelated “performance” issues or moving them to a position they were not suited for in hopes that they quit voluntarily. These are just the cases that have been reported, and the circumstances definitely contribute to Taiwan’s low birthrate.
On a related note, there have been a few atrocious remarks regarding pregnancy among the many bizarrely misogynistic comments political campaigners have made in the lead-up to the Jan. 11 presidential and legislative elections. The latest offender is Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘).
While campaigning for Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative candidate Yang Chiung-ying (楊瓊瓔) on Friday last week, Gou said that Yang’s independent opponent, Hung Tzu-yung (洪慈庸), only cared about getting married and giving birth since she was elected as a lawmaker in 2016. Gou is a business owner with hundreds of thousands of employees, and this is not acceptable given the circumstances described above.
The sexist remarks from the KMT camp have not stopped despite a public backlash, and it is clear that these “slips of tongues” are intentionally malicious and they have not understood the message. How will society respect pregnant women, or women in general, if the nation’s leaders keep making such comments?
Negative campaigning is one thing, but it should be about concrete things like political blunders or questionable ethics, not gender. There are still 10 days until the elections and this must stop right now.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Alarm bells over a “hollowing out” of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry and US demands for “protection money” have fueled a panic over Taiwan. To understand how misplaced these fears are, consider the movements of global technology giants. Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) CEO Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) could undoubtedly understand the situation best, and they continue to make key investments in Taiwan. They do not make decisions on a whim. They are the architects of global computing power strategy and possess the highest levels of industry knowledge. No