There have been reports that the Taipei City Government recently concluded its months-long investigation into a sexual harassment complaint by former deputy spokeswoman Huang Ching-ying (黃?瑩) against former city consultant Liu Chia-jen (劉嘉仁).
Since the case involved the parties’ personal privacy, the city decided to only announce the results to the people involved and the authority in charge.
In response, Huang said in an interview in Yilan County that she would respect the decision, and thanked everyone for their concern.
She said that as next month’s presidential and legislative elections are less than a month away, she quit her job at the Taipei City Government to focus on campaigning for the Taiwan People’s Party.
She added that since she has switched to campaign mode, she hopes her sexual harassment complaint will smoothly come to a close.
If the case does not make a ripple, it would be a blow to efforts at eliminating sexual violence and promoting gender equality. More seriously, it would hurt the city government’s image as a responsible authority that should have handled the issue in accordance with the law, clear the innocent and punish the guilty.
Furthermore, the decision to not make the results public is unfair to Huang, as it fails to clearly do her justice, but perhaps also to Liu, who might have felt wronged due to some misunderstanding.
Liu tried to clarify his role to the public, saying that he was “fully confident” of his innocence.
If no sexual harassment occured, he would be taking the blame unjustly.
If there was sexual harassment, is the Taipei City Government holding him legally accountable by transferring him to the Taipei City Hospital as a special assistant as reports say?
The alleged sexual harassment involves two public figures, as well as the character and integrity of private individuals. Article 9 in the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act (性騷擾防治法) addresses financial compensation for and restoring the reputation of a victim.
Although Article 12 states that media outlets may not report or record a victim’s name or other information that could lead to the discovery of their identity, it stresses that “there will be no such limitation if an agreement is given by a competent victim, or if the criminal investigation agency thinks that revealing the victim’s identity is necessary in accordance with the law.”
In other words, the city government’s mishandling of the sexual harassment complaint fails to distinguish between right and wrong, and it might violate the principle of proportionality and bring continuous harm to both parties.
Without truth, there can be no justice or forgiveness.
Perhaps Huang did not want to cause Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) trouble, so she said that she would rather focus on the campaign.
However, these are two separate issues. Yes is yes, no is no.
When public figures or civil servants are involved in this kind of case, there should be no ambiguity. The decision to not make the results public contravenes Ko’s own principle to do the right things and to do them correctly.
Hu Wen-chi is a former vice chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Culture and Communications Committee.
Translated by Eddy Chang
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US