An economist says he was pushed out of his job at a Chinese bank in part due to his views on the effect of Hong Kong’s protests.
A brokerage employee in the territory is looking for a new job because she disagrees with her bosses’ politics.
An investment banker says he avoids talking to most colleagues about the unrest, fearing it might damage his career.
At financial firms across Hong Kong, personal political views that used to have little bearing on work are taking on new significance, as the territory’s pro-democracy protests harden opinions on both sides of the debate.
For some in the industry, it is making an already difficult business environment even tougher to navigate and fueling concerns about Hong Kong’s future as one of the world’s premier financial hubs.
The change is being felt most acutely at state-owned Chinese financial companies, where several backers of the protests say they fear retribution from superiors if they are found to attend rallies or otherwise support the pro-democracy movement.
Law Ka Chung (羅家聰), former chief economist at Bank of Communications (Hong Kong), has gone public with his concerns, saying on Tuesday last week that he suspects he was ousted in part because his research contradicted the Chinese government’s narrative on Hong Kong.
While global banks operating in the territory are more insulated from local politics, they are not immune. At BNP Paribas SA, a legal executive left the company in September to focus on activism after social media posts on his personal account led to the bank issuing a public apology.
In Citigroup Inc’s Hong Kong office, some pro-Beijing staff are now socializing less frequently with their pro-democracy counterparts, with the rift becoming more apparent in the wake of a widely circulated video of one of the firm’s investment bankers being arrested after a scuffle with police, employees familiar with the matter said.
The employees, who asked not to be named, as they were discussing a sensitive subject, emphasized that in most cases the differences of opinion have yet to get in the way of work.
When a JPMorgan Chase & Co banker from mainland China was filmed being punched during his lunch break after shouting: “We are all Chinese” at a crowd of yelling protesters, several employees complained verbally to their managers about his behavior, a person with knowledge of the matter said.
It is not clear from the video what initially sparked the confrontation, and there is no indication it was connected to his employer.
Conversations between some JPMorgan staff from mainland China and their peers from Hong Kong have become less frequent since the protests began, two people said.
For senior managers in Hong Kong’s financial industry — which accounts for about 20 percent of the territory’s GDP — the potential for rising workplace tensions adds to challenges that already include a sinking local economy and a pullback in dealmaking.
Banks have to find ways to accommodate employees with differing views without getting caught up in controversies that damage their brands, said Benjamin Quinlan, chief executive officer of financial services consultancy Quinlan & Associates in Hong Kong.
“Firms need to be much more clever about the way things are handled, carefully balancing free and open thinking while ensuring ongoing employee professionalism,” said Quinlan, a former executive at Deutsche Bank AG.
In response to questions from Bloomberg News, a Citigroup spokesman said that the US bank “values diversity and inclusion, which speaks to not just gender or ethnic diversity, but also diversity of thought. We respect people with different views and perspectives and our staff and clients respect that diversity too.”
A JPMorgan spokeswoman said that the firm’s employees “come from all walks of life and so many different backgrounds and continue to support each other.”
BNP declined to comment when the executive left in September, while BoCom did not respond to a request for comment.
Law, who spent more than 14 years at the Chinese bank, wrote in an August article that Hong Kong’s protests would worsen the territory’s slowdown, but that their effect was limited, a view that contradicted the dire outlook in China’s state-run media.
He was asked to leave the bank shortly after he shared with colleagues a link to an outside article critical of China’s firewalls and closed system, Law said.
He left behind a team of mainly local Hong Kongers.
“I wish them good luck,” he said in an interview.
Employees at other Chinese financial firms said that they have felt similar pressure to toe Beijing’s line.
Man, 25, who works in a back office at a Chinese brokerage in Hong Kong, said that her firm’s department heads have told employees that they will be fired if they participate in pro-democracy protests.
The company sends staff to pro-police rallies, which Man has attended even though she also takes part in pro-democracy protests without telling her employer.
While she wants to leave the firm, she is finding it difficult because most of the job openings she sees in Hong Kong are with mainland Chinese firms.
Like others who agreed to speak for this article, she asked to use only one name, because of the subject’s sensitivity.
Jason, who works at a Chinese investment bank in Hong Kong, said that most of the senior executives at his firm openly condemn the protests and are strongly supportive of Beijing.
Lower-level managers who have lived in Hong Kong for years tend to have a milder stance — supporting the right to demonstrate while condemning violence — whereas middle and back-office workers are typically Hong Kong locals who back the protesters, he said.
His views place him somewhere in the middle of the spectrum, Jason said.
Wary of offending someone on either side, he said he takes care to speak about the protests only with his closest coworkers when they are outside the office on cigarette breaks.
Another banker, surnamed Chan (陳), said that he is part of a small minority of pro-democracy employees at a Chinese securities firm.
Fearful of “whistle-blowers” who might out him to pro-Beijing managers, he keeps quiet when colleagues discuss the protests at lunch.
Some of his peers have been reported to high-level bosses in China for social media posts that contradict Chinese Communist Party messaging, he said.
Chan keeps his own posts on Facebook and WeChat free of politics, although he sometimes shares song lyrics that convey subtle messages of support for the pro-democracy movement.
In a Facebook post on Wednesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) wrote: “The KMT must fall for Taiwan to improve.’ Allow me to ask the question again: Is this really true?” It matters not how many times Hsu asks the question, my answer will always be the same: “Yes, the KMT must be toppled for Taiwan to improve.” In the lengthy Facebook post, titled “What were those born in the 1980s guilty of?” Hsu harked back to the idealistic aspirations of the 2014 Sunflower movement before heaping opprobrium on the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP)
The scuffle between Chinese embassy staffers in Fiji and a Taiwanese diplomat at a Republic of China (ROC) Double Ten National Day celebration has turned into a public relations opportunity for the government, Beijing and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Although the incident occurred on Oct. 8, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) downplayed it, only for the story to be picked up by the foreign media, forcing the ministry to respond. The public and opposition parties asked why the government had failed to remonstrate more strongly in the first instance. It is still unclear whether the ministry missed a trick
US President Donald Trump and his Democratic rival, former US vice president Joe Biden, are holding their final debate tonight. In their foreign policy debate, China is sure to be a major issue of contention for the two candidates. Here are several questions the moderator should pose to the candidates: For both: In the first televised US presidential debates in 1960, then-Democratic candidate John F. Kennedy and his Republican counterpart, Richard Nixon, were asked whether the US should intervene if communist China attacked Taiwan’s outlying islands of Kinmen and Matsu. Kennedy said no, unless the main island of Taiwan was also attacked.
For most of us, the colorful, otherworldly marinescapes of coral reefs are as remote as the alien landscapes of the moon. We rarely, if ever, experience these underwater wonderlands for ourselves — we are, after all, air-breathing, terrestrial creatures mostly cocooned in cities. It is easy not to notice the perilous state they are in: We have lost 50 percent of coral reefs in the past 20 years and more than 90 percent are expected to die by 2050, a presentation at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Diego, California, earlier this year showed. As the oceans heat further and