Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, has said that his position on the mothballed Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is that as long as there are no questions as to its safety and there is public approval, construction could be restarted and the plant made operational.
The statement raises several questions: What is the standard for determining that there are no questions as to the plant’s safety and who should set those standards?
As the safety of the plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) affects the safety of the lives and homes of northern Taiwan residents, who would believe a politician’s empty guarantee that it would be safe to start up the plant, which someone has described as a “do it yourself” project?
Han has also said that there has been a breakthrough in nuclear waste treatment, so that it could be reprocessed and reused.
However, the question is whether Taiwan has this technology, or whether it even exists somewhere else.
New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has said that the final disposal of nuclear waste has been discussed for decades, and questioned whether the government has the capability to treat nuclear waste as well as where it should be stored.
Hou’s concern puts the finger on the lack of a solution and the helplessness that people feel regarding nuclear waste, especially spent fuel rods.
The spent fuel rods at the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant, the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant and the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant remain inside the plants without any kind of treatment, not to mention final disposal.
The nation’s nuclear power plants are taking a single-use approach to the nuclear fuel cycle by not reprocessing and reusing spent fuel rods, and instead moving on to final disposal. This makes it impossible to take a closed-cycle approach and adopt the mixed oxide fuel technology that France uses.
Where then does the “reprocess and reuse” that Han is talking about come from?
The spent fuel rods produced by uranium-235 and uranium-238 used at the plants can be used to make weapons-grade plutonium-239, using chemical extraction technology, which is problematic from the perspective of nuclear proliferation.
Some say that shipping the spent fuel rods to China for final disposal could result in Beijing turning them into nuclear weapons, which could have intolerable consequences.
It is time that Taiwanese politicians stopped talking about restarting construction and the activation of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.
Chen Yi-nan is convener of Northern Taiwan Society’s Technology and Environmental Protection Group.
Translated by Perry Svensson
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his