The presidential election is less than two months away, but the chances of winning for Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate, do not look promising, judging from the people around me.
Granted, voters whose political inclination leans toward the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) will certainly not vote for Han, but even academics, lawyers and entrepreneurs who have long supported the KMT shake their heads in disapproval upon the mention of Han and wonder why the party would nominate a person who constantly uses vulgar language and recklessly writes checks that bounce, instead of choosing Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) or former New Taipei City mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫).
Many pan-blue camp supporters have started to find Han disagreeable, thinking that he brings shame to them. The sentiments are more negative than those they had against Sean Lien (連勝文), the party’s candidate in the 2014 Taipei mayoral election.
Taiwanese voters tend to be influenced by loyalty, personal preference or benefits, and they are easily guided by charismatic political leaders. Regardless of their discontent or reluctance, they would still cast ballots.
However, since the 2008 presidential election, voters have gradually become “rational citizens,” as evidenced by some of the pan-green camp supporters who would rather not vote for the DPP candidate than vote “while holding back their tears” so as to give the party a hard lesson after former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his family were embroiled in corruption scandals, which struck a huge blow to Chen’s — and the DPP’s — images.
During the 2014 Taipei mayoral election, the KMT nominated Lien, who had no political experience, simply because he is the son of former vice president Lien Chan (連戰). So unpopular was the decision that pan-blue camp voters supported then-independent candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
Many KMT supporters also said that their support is not blind and inexhaustible — “we will give the party a hard lesson if it goes too far.”
Having evolved from voting “while holding back their tears” to not voting “while holding back their tears,” some voters in Taiwan are moving toward becoming “citizens.” Under such a transformation, political parties can no longer win votes through mere mobilization and ideology — they also need political achievements and good candidates to garner support.
Supporters might not necessarily do an about-face and vote for another party, but if they stay at home on election day, it would still have a tremendous effect on the blue, green and white camps.
Not casting a ballot for a candidate one dislikes is an important development for Taiwan’s gradually maturing democracy.
Han is making a great impact on Taiwan during this election campaign. He is skilled at campaigning and manipulating political language, but as Taiwan enjoys freedom of expression, he has the right to do so. At the same time, Han’s statements and actions are also subject to a high level of scrutiny.
Over the past several months, people have been wondering why Han’s popularity has taken a downturn, why he has lost his lead over President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and fallen 18 percentage points, and whether he is failing to live up to the expectations of Kaohsiung residents, throwing his hat into the ring before proving his mettle as mayor.
After his win, he turned his back on KMT Legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and former Kaohsiung County commissioner Yang Chiu-hsing (楊秋興), both of whom made great efforts to help him win the election, which makes one wonder if Han burns important bridges.
His use of vulgar language and careless political pledges make people think he has no respect for basic manners and that he is an irresponsible politician. It was not without reason that People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), before announcing his own presidential bid, said that Han is “good at lying.”
If Han loses the election in January, that would open up the KMT and the pan-blue camp — which have gone too long without reform — to review and evaluate their future direction. If Han wins the election, will Taiwan be thrown into endless chaos by him and his supporters’ narrow-mindedness, or will Taiwan’s future be decided by traditional voters and citizens hoping for reform?
There is a vast difference between success and failure.
Wei Chien-feng is a lawyer.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS