Vaclav Havel, the brilliant playwright, heroic political dissident and visionary first president of liberated Czechoslovakia, consistently emphasized the moral element in international relations.
They were lessons he learned from his country’s painful history of invasion and occupation, first by Nazi Germany, then by the Soviet Union.
On Feb. 22, 1990, he delivered an address to the US Congress, which I attended. He talked of the competing pressures, especially economic ones, that impede people and governments from doing the right thing, such as resisting tyranny.
“Interests of all kinds — personal, selfish, state, nation, group and, if you like, company interests — still considerably outweigh genuinely common and global interests,” he said.
His countrymen still wrestle with the moral quandary he described, and many, if not all, carry on the noble example he set.
As the US-based National Public Radio (NPR) has reported, glorious Prague, the “City of 100 Spires,” presently is grappling with such a moral challenge, this time from China.
When he was president, Havel, having lived through the brutality of Soviet communism, was no admirer of the Chinese communist system. He proudly supported those he considered moral and political soul mates: the Dalai Lama and Chinese dissidents, which earned him no credits with Beijing.
However, Czech President Milos Zeman, a populist who took office in 2013, easily succumbed to the lure of the economic opportunities Beijing offered and entered into a series of agreements with China.
According to NPR, Zeman envisioned the Czech Republic as “China’s gateway to Europe,” and invited Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for a state visit in 2016.
During that visit, Prague was named a “sister city” to Beijing and the agreement contained a provision endorsing Beijing’s “one China” principle asserting that Taiwan is part of China.
However, over the next few years, major projects failed under fraudulent management practices, and relations with China began to sour.
Martin Hala, a China expert at Prague’s historic Charles University, told NPR: “There’s been this backlash building up slowly. People really feel cheated. A lot of things that have been happening in relation to China have been driven by local actors.”
Prague Mayor Zdenek Hrib, who once worked as a medical intern in Taiwan, demonstrated the professor’s point about local activism.
On taking office, he immediately questioned the appropriateness of Prague’s involvement in the China-Taiwan dispute.
“A sister-city agreement should not include things that are not related to the cities’ relationship,” Hrib said.
At a city assembly meeting, one member accused the mayor of meddling in the business of the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs, saying: “Here you are, pulling Prague into a matter of such importance.”
Before the city government could vote to excise the anti-Taiwan language from the sister-city agreement, Beijing canceled it. For good measure, it also withdrew its permission for a 12-city visit to China by the Prague Philharmonic Orchestra, which had spent two-and-a-half years preparing for it in what its director called “the biggest project we’ve ever had.”
Cancelation of the tour was a US$200,000 loss for the orchestra, on top of the millions of US dollars Prague already had lost from fraudulent transactions by Chinese entities when relations were good between Beijing and Prague.
Hrib told NPR the city was learning lessons about China.
“It was quite obvious that the only thing that the Beijing side was focused on was their propaganda, and not the political or cultural exchange we were interested in,” he said.
He also said he “felt very badly; we have to do something because people are suffering from this.”
Given its past practices, Beijing is likely to impose additional punishment on Prague and the Czech Republic, both known for their “fortitude” under the Nazi and Soviet ordeals.
Zeman has tried to forestall further Chinese retaliation by appealing to Xi and distancing his office from the city’s action.
Nevertheless, as Hala told NPR in defense of the mayor’s action: “There is a reason for the backlash, why the mayor has stood up. People have to.”
The question is what other local and national governments in Europe, and elsewhere, will do in the face of China’s economic and ideological onslaught — and whether they can manage to organize a collective response that will increase the strength of the individual.
If, for example, other musical ventures and performers would cancel their China tours in artistic comradeship with Prague’s Philharmonic, Beijing might not find its heavy-handed retribution so useful or so welcome to the Chinese.
The example of the National Basketball Association and a host of major US companies is certainly not inspiring.
It is time to turn Beijing’s instruments of intimidation against it through cultural, as well as economic, disentanglement until China gets the message of how civilized nations behave.
Within days of the NPR report, the Eastman Philharmonic Orchestra at the University of Rochester canceled its tour of China, because Beijing denied visas to its South Korean members. The orchestra previously had decided to make the tour without the three students, but better judgement and sounder ethics prevailed.
There are things the Czechs themselves still can do to teach China that it does not hold all the cards, that retaliation can be a double-edged sword.
Democratic Prague might wish to explore a sister-city relationship with democratic Taipei, with shared values that are deeper and more durable than the economic relations with Beijing proved to be.
If China chooses to punish the Czechs even more severely, their national leaders, heirs to the Havel legacy, may decide that democratic Taiwan is a better long-term partner than communist China.
Other countries under pressure from Beijing might find it an example to follow.
Joseph Bosco served as China country director in the office of the US secretary of defense. He is a fellow at the Institute for Taiwan-American Studies and a member of the advisory committee of the Global Taiwan Institute.
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops