From higher-quality paint to state-of-the-art propellers: Shipping companies are looking in every corner to reduce their carbon footprint as investor and activist pressure increases.
The move comes as aviation and shipping firms face demands to slash emissions due to their reliance on oil. The two sectors are expected to account for 40 percent of global carbon dioxide output by 2050 unless action is taken, the European Environment Agency said.
International shipping accounts for 2.2 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions, according to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), more than aviation’s 2 percent share.
The IMO, a UN agency, has said it aims to halve greenhouse gas emissions from 2008 levels by 2050.
“Ships are long-life assets, typically up to 25 years, and if the industry is to meet the IMO target ... then we need to accelerate the pace of change to greener vessels,” said Stephen Fewster, the London-based global head of shipping finance for Dutch bank ING.
A private initiative launched this year also means leading banks are to change how they look at financing modern, more fuel-efficient ships at a time when the sector faces a capital shortfall estimated to be at least US$20 billion.
While questions loom over whether shipping could meet its 2050 target without an overhaul of the types of cleaner fuel available and infrastructure, shipping firms are making individual efforts to change in a shake-up seen costing billions.
US agricultural group Cargill, one of the world’s biggest charterers of dry-bulk ships, has a target of reducing its carbon dioxide output per cargo-tonne-mile by 15 percent by 2020 from 2016 levels and has already cut it by more than 12 percent.
One measure taken is the use of higher-quality paints that give a smoother hull, meaning less energy is used on a voyage.
“If the industry would move from the standard paints to more sophisticated ones, and used in combination with other initiatives, this could have a real impact on decreasing emissions,” Cargill’s ocean transportation business president Jan Dieleman said.
Emanuele Grimaldi, president and managing director of Italian shipping company Grimaldi Group, said apart from changing the paint that the firm uses, it has modified propellers for 30 of its ships.
To save fuel, Grimaldi has also introduced slower speeds when coming into port areas at night and increased the capacity of some of its fleet so that each ship has the capacity for more cargo.
“These are lots of small things but if put all together they can make a difference,” he said, adding that the whole group had achieved an annual carbon dioxide reduction of 300,000 tonnes.
The IMO has adopted mandatory rules for new vessels to boost fuel efficiency as a way of cutting carbon dioxide from ship engines, but a final plan on these is not expected until 2023.
In September, an initiative was launched to get zero-carbon ships and fuels on the water by 2030.
In a report this June, the nonprofit organization CDP (formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project) ranked NYK Line, Maersk and Mitsui OSK Lines as the three shipping companies most prepared for a low-carbon transition, out of 18 of the largest publicly listed shipping firms.
Maersk, the world’s biggest container line, aims to be carbon neutral by 2050, and has spent US$1 billion over the past four years retrofitting around 150 vessels.
“Such measures will represent a small fraction of the overall capex expenditure required to meet the IMO’s target,” a spokesman for the CDP said.
A report by the Energy Transition Commission, a panel of global experts, last year estimated that a fully decarbonized shipping industry could cost less than 0.2 percent of GDP in 2050, or below US$600 billion a year.
This compares with less than 0.13 percent of GDP or under US$500 billion per year for a fully decarbonized aviation sector.
“Maersk’s target is a big deal. There isn’t an aviation company in the world close to making that sort of commitment,” said Ned Harvey, a managing director at the Rocky Mountain Institute think tank in Boulder, Colorado.
“We have the financial industry taking climate alignment seriously and that is going to make it real, as well as customers asking for lower-carbon supply chains,” he added.
The second-largest container line, Switzerland’s MSC, achieved a 13 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions per tonne-mile carried during 2015 to last year.
It has retrofitted more than 250 ships in its fleet with the latest design features including propellers and bulbous bows, as well as better performing engines.
It is also deploying 11 new megaships, including the MSC Gulsun — the world’s largest container ship — with the lowest carbon footprint by design.
“When you go beyond 2030 and look across the industry’s container fleet and the broader maritime sector, the future goals around carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases will not be achievable without some major breakthroughs in fuel and propulsion technologies,” MSC Group executive vice president Bud Darr said.
While there have been signs of growing interest in using liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a cleaner fuel, take-up is slow. Other options, including hydrogen and ammonia, are years away and costly, some experts and shippers say.
“It’s going to get tougher and tougher and we are running out of time. We need to build zero-emission fuel vessels in the next 10 years. We don’t need to mess about with LNG,” Lasse Kristoffersen, president and CEO of Norwegian shipping company Torvald Klaveness, said at a shipping conference last month.
Pressure on the sector is also coming from lenders. Banks are gradually becoming more selective about which ships they include in their lending portfolios due to an initiative launched in June called the “Poseidon Principles.”
Eleven banks representing US$100 billion of the global shipping portfolio joined the initiative, which would for the first time integrate efforts to cut carbon dioxide emissions into banks’ decisionmaking when providing loans to shipping companies.
There is about US$450 billion of senior debt that the world’s shipping banks and Chinese lenders grant to the sector and about 70,000 commercial vessels, said Paul Taylor, the London-based global head of shipping and offshore with Societe Generale CIB.
ING, which, according to market sources, has a shipping finance portfolio estimated at US$10 billion, is among the banks that joined the initiative and finances the most modern and latest design ships.
“ING and other leading ship-finance banks have a strong preference to finance more environmentally- friendly vessels, which in turn should encourage shipyards to continue to improve vessel design and efficiency,” Fewster said.
Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5. I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US. The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump. He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so. “Trump believes
The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there. Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters. The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in
The Russian city of Vladivostok lies approximately 45km from the Sino-Russian border on the Sea of Japan. The area was not always Russian territory: It was once the site of a Chinese settlement. The settlement would later be known as Yongmingcheng (永明城), the “city of eternal light,” during the Yuan Dynasty. That light was extinguished in 1858 when a large area of land was ceded by the Qing Dynasty to the Russian Empire with the signing of the Treaty of Aigun. The People’s Republic of China founded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has never ruled Taiwan. Taiwan was governed by the
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being