Three of the world’s more affluent cities have erupted in protests and unrest this year.
Paris has faced waves of protests and rioting since November last year, soon after French President Emmanuel Macron raised fuel taxes. Hong Kong has been in upheaval since March, after Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) proposed a law to allow extradition to mainland China. Santiago exploded in rioting this month after Chilean President Sebastian Pinera ordered an increase in metro prices.
Each protest has its distinct local factors, but taken together, they tell a larger story of what can happen when a sense of unfairness combines with a widespread perception of low social mobility.
By the traditional metric of GDP per capita, the three cities are paragons of economic success.
Per capita income is about US$40,000 in Hong Kong, more than US$60,000 in Paris and about US$18,000 in Santiago, one of the wealthiest cities in Latin America. In this year’s Global Competitiveness Report issued by the World Economic Forum, Hong Kong ranks third, France 15th and Chile 33rd (the best in Latin America by a wide margin).
Yet, while these countries are quite rich and competitive by conventional standards, their populations are dissatisfied with key aspects of their lives. According to this year’s World Happiness Report, the citizens of Hong Kong, France and Chile feel that their lives are stuck in important ways.
Each year, the Gallup Poll asks people all over the world, “Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your freedom to choose what you do with your life?” While Hong Kong ranks ninth globally in GDP per capita, it ranks far lower, in 66th place, in terms of the public’s perception of the personal freedom to choose a life course.
The same discrepancy is apparent in France (25th in GDP per capita, but 69th in freedom to choose) and Chile (48th and 98th respectively).
Ironically, both the Heritage Foundation and Simon Fraser University rank Hong Kong as having the most economic freedom in the entire world, yet Hong Kong residents despair of their freedom to choose what to do with their lives.
In all three countries, urban young people not born into wealth despair of their chances of finding affordable housing and a decent job. In Hong Kong, property prices relative to average salaries are among the highest in the world. Chile has the highest income inequality in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the club of high-income countries. In France, children of elite families have vast advantages in their life course.
Because of very high housing prices, most people are pushed away from the central business districts and typically depend on personal vehicles or public transport to get to work. Much of the public might thus be especially sensitive to changes in transportation prices, as shown by the explosion of protests in Paris and Santiago.
Hong Kong, France and Chile are hardly alone in facing a crisis of social mobility and grievances over inequality. The US is experiencing soaring suicide rates and other signs of social distress, such as mass shootings, at a time of unprecedented inequality and a collapse in public trust in government. The US would certainly see more social explosions ahead if it continues with politics and economics as usual.
LEARNING LESSONS
To head off that outcome, lessons must be drawn from these three recent cases. All three governments were blindsided by the protests. Having lost touch with public sentiment, they failed to anticipate that a seemingly modest policy action (Hong Kong’s extradition bill, France’s fuel tax increase and higher metro prices in Chile) would trigger a massive social explosion.
Perhaps most importantly, and least surprising, traditional economic measures of well-being are wholly insufficient to gauge the public’s real sentiments. GDP per capita measures an economy’s average income, but says nothing about its distribution, people’s perceptions of fairness or injustice, the public’s sense of financial vulnerability or other conditions (such as trust in the government) that weigh heavily on the overall quality of life.
Furthermore, rankings such as the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitive Index, the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom and Simon Fraser University’s measure of Economic Freedom of the World also capture far too little about the public’s subjective sense of fairness, freedom to make life choices, the government’s honesty and the perceived trustworthiness of fellow citizens.
To learn about such sentiments, it is necessary to ask the public directly about their life satisfaction, sense of personal freedom, trust in government and compatriots, and about other dimensions of social life that bear heavily on life quality and therefore on the prospects of social upheaval. That is the approach taken by Gallup’s annual surveys on well-being, which my colleagues and I report on each year in the World Happiness Report.
The idea of sustainable development, reflected in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the world’s governments in 2015, is to move beyond traditional indicators such as GDP growth and per capita income, to a much richer set of objectives, including social fairness, trust and environmental sustainability. The SDGs, for example, draw specific attention not only to income inequality (SDG 10), but also to broader measures of well-being (SDG 3).
It behooves every society to take the pulse of its population and heed well the sources of social unhappiness and distrust. Economic growth without fairness and environmental sustainability is a recipe for disorder, not for well-being.
What is needed is far greater provision of public services, more redistribution of income from rich to poor, and more public investment to achieve environmental sustainability. Even apparently sensible policies such as ending fuel subsidies or raising metro prices to cover costs lead to massive upheavals if carried out under conditions of low social trust, high inequality and a widely shared sense of unfairness.
Jeffrey Sachs, a professor of sustainable development and professor of health policy and management at Columbia University, is director of Columbia’s Center for Sustainable Development and of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
RSS