On Sept. 29, as students rallied in cities all around Taiwan in support of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) issued a statement about the Hong Kong protests.
The four points stated by the KMT seem to be playing a safe game. However, without condemning the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and not having mentioned the assault on Hong Kong singer and democracy advocate Denise Ho (何韻詩) — who had red paint splashed on her in Taipei during an interview ahead of the rally there — the statement sounded like an off-the-cuff comment by a guy on the street.
The KMT said that “Hong Kong is a society based on the foundation of rule of law” and called for rational dialogue to avoid violence.
This is a deliberate attempt by the KMT to mischaracterize the Hong Kong people’s struggle for democracy as a violent confrontation between the police and people in which both parties share responsibility. It is clear that the KMT is attempting to write off the commitment and determination of Hong Kongers in their fight for democracy.
The KMT also said that the Democratic Progressive Party is exploiting the protests in Hong Kong, using them as an opportunity to stoke fears of China and anti-Chinese sentiment, and thereby escalating cross-strait tensions.
This accusation is neither nuanced nor new. If the KMT really cares about Hong Kong’s democracy, it should stand up with young people in their struggle against the CCP for democracy.
The KMT dares not offend China, so it is always reluctant to express its opinions on the democratic movement in Hong Kong. The reason why it has deliberately released the statement of its so-called four positions is because opinion polls are showing that the popularity of Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the party’s presidental candidate, is plummeting.
Therefore, the KMT’s motivation for caring about Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement is due solely to its own political interests. However, in its statement, the KMT has given away its ideology of supporting the “1992 consensus,” which deliberately emphasizes the “one China” principle, with both sides agreeing to make their own interpretation to deceive the Taiwanese.
The CCP has repeatedly stressed — openly in any given diplomatic talks — that “the Taiwan issue is China’s domestic issue” and “Taiwan is an inseparable part of China.” Under circumstances like these, the idea of the “one China” principle with different interpretations has long ago been disproved by the CCP.
Why does the KMT continue to play this old trick to deceive itself and the Taiwanese?
The reason any democratic movements in Taiwan are frustrated is because a certain political party in Taiwan echoes the stance of the CCP, suppressing the desire of the Taiwanese to maintain peace and protect democracy.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has said that the threat to Taiwan comes from outside the nation. In fact, disintegration from within is a bigger issue.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.