As the race to implement 5G cellular network technology heats up, there has been considerable anxiety about Taiwan’s standing in the pack. As many of its global peers have already held spectrum auctions, the National Communications Commission (NCC) pushed forward the date for its own to Dec. 10 and is amending regulations to ensure flexibility to develop 5G systems and applications.
Excitement is swirling around the potential uses of 5G technology, from autonomous vehicle networks to virtual reality streaming, but the development of such applications is still a way off, while uses that no one has yet considered will likely emerge. At this stage, attention must be focused on building an ecosystem that ensures telecoms play fairly and application developers are given space to explore.
To this end, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has proposed setting aside the 3.7 gigahertz (GHz) to 3.8GHz frequency band for the exclusive use of developers, instead of selling it to a telecom. While this is a good idea in theory, lawmakers on the Legislative Yuan’s Transportation Committee on Monday last week were right to question the idea.
Testing on the spectrum that an application is to be deployed on is only one element to successful implementation — cost-effective frequency availability and equipment needs must also be considered.
For applications that need a large network, it is far more cost effective to use a telecom’s existing equipment, while the vast majority of other applications would still be best implemented using cables or Wi-Fi.
Considering the insufficient six or 12-month time limit that the plan proposes for private developers, the ministry’s idea seems to mainly focus on providing more space for public use application development, which is an important facet to prioritize.
When determining how to structure the 5G regulatory environment, decisionmakers must keep in mind the question: Are people getting the right benefits out of the limited frequency spectrum?
A better way to approach this question than setting aside a testing ground might be to require telecoms to ensure sufficient bandwidth and latency guarantees for approved public-use applications, in addition to the NT$26.6 million (US$856,904) that the NCC has already allocated to facilitate partnerships between telecoms and developers.
Telecoms left to their own devices cannot be relied on to put their weight behind new and untested applications, although they remain the best option for building infrastructure.
The major telecoms have admitted that they are hesitant to move forward with 5G development. Each telecom spent NT$60 billion to implement 4G and they are expecting 5G to be two to three times more expensive. Also, considering the 4G WiMAX fiasco, in which service providers invested heavily early on to become industry leaders only to be pushed out by the Long-Term Evolution standard, they are right to be wary.
In this race, the countries with the strongest foundations will create the best services. As the government is looking to push ahead with 5G deployment, it must not let its impatience to be on the cutting edge harm the chance to build seamless smart cities and applications that will set Taiwan apart from its peers.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which