Last week, as Europe commemorated the eightieth anniversary of the outbreak of World War II, the far-right Alternative for Germany became the most popular choice for young voters in the east German state of Saxony.
Along with a strong performance in local elections the same day in Brandenburg, the results were a reminder of just how dramatically far-right political parties have resurrected themselves in modern Europe.
Trading off economic frustration and disquiet over migration, they are weaponizing technology and social media, international networks and widespread frustration with the political “status quo.”
Illustration: Tania Chou
Such parties do not necessarily need outright power to achieve their goals, as shown by right-wing Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini when he was minister of the interior, turning away migrant rescue ships and arresting one of the captains.
However, Italy’s example also points to the challenges faced by such groups. After bringing down the government earlier this year, Salvini was widely expected to become prime minister. Instead, he has found himself kept out by an alliance of more moderate parties.
However, the lesson of the 1930s — another era of dislocation, change and paranoia — remains stark. Adolf Hitler’s Nazis never won more than one-third of the votes in a democratic election, but that was enough to give them a stranglehold on power, given the proportional representation-based German constitution.
Some far-right leaders continue to be plagued by scandal and ineptitude. Austria’s Freedom Party was forced from government in May after its leader, Heinz-Christian Strache, was filmed in a video sting known as the Ibiza tapes, promising government contracts to a woman he believed to be a Russian oligarch’s niece.
Nevertheless, the party looks set for a strong showing in the resulting Sept. 29 election.
France’s far-right appears similarly resilient. Having lost to French President Emmanuel Macron in the 2017 presidential elections, Marine Le Pen’s National Front rebranded itself last summer as the National Rally and won the European parliamentary elections this May with a ticket fronted by 23-year-old Jordan Bardella.
Le Pen, whose father founded the party in 1972 and lost a presidential runoff against Jacques Chirac 30 years later, remains firmly in control, with another chance of seizing the Elysee Palace at the next opportunity in 2022.
“The point is that they are going mainstream,” said Julia Ebner, a research fellow specializing in the far-right at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue think tank in London. “They are playing a very long game and targeting the next generation.”
As in France, it is a strategy that has seen right-wing political parties in Spain, Denmark and elsewhere field candidates in their late 20s high on the slate, seeing young white male voters in particular as their path to greater power.
Figures such as 26-year-old Belgian Dries Van Langenhove helped Belgium’s right-wing Vlaams Belang to its best-ever showing in simultaneous May regional, national and European elections.
Yet, there are limits to the trend. Even among young men, far-right parties still often struggle to gain much more than one-third of the vote. Geographical support remains patchy.
As they become more radical, parties can shed moderate followers even as they gain new ones; Alternative for Germany may be rising in the country’s more economically marginalized east, but it appears to be losing support in richer western areas. Female voters remain particularly skeptical, prompting growing discussion in right-wing circles over how to win them over.
Van Langenhove, Bardella and others are part of an increasingly sophisticated continent-wide movement, tying together social media, real-world demonstrations and rallies and a single-minded determination to seize political office.
Well-resourced campaigns include “Generation Identity,” a largely youth-facing movement that began in France, but has also seen its popularity grow in Austria, Germany, Italy and elsewhere.
It is a sign of how increasingly coordinated such movements are — perhaps ironic, given their often nationalist agendas.
Many take explicit encouragement from US right-wingers and white supremacists, as well as Russian President Vladimir Putin, seen by many on the right as what a national leader should be: ruthless, macho and untroubled by principles such as human rights or political correctness.
Such groups and their leaders are also often the main beneficiaries of suspected Russian hacking, trolling and other online activity, supporting the suggestion that the Kremlin would like to see a more fragmented, right-wing dominated West.
Far-right messaging, which includes online videos, is widespread and varied, not all of it branded to associate with the far-right.
However, behind talk of the need to confront Islamist fundamentalism and protect women’s rights is a wider message — that mass migration and multicultural liberalism are destroying Europe, and only the right can stop it.
Right-wing governments in Hungary and Poland shine a light on what the far-right might look like in office: more state media control and rhetoric against not just migrants and foreigners, but other minorities such as the LGBT community.
However, many supporters would like to go further — online discussion of “remigration” includes not just repatriating new arrivals, but deporting families who have spent generations in Europe.
Such arguments risk becoming not just a constant feature of European politics, but its defining theme for years or decades.
That is a truly terrifying prospect, and it is likely no coincidence that it has only become possible now that many fewer people have lived experience of the lessons of 1939.
Peter Apps is a writer on international affairs, globalization, conflict and other issues. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Study of the 21st Century, a non-national, non-partisan, non-ideological think tank. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
An outrageous dismissal of the exemplary Taiwanese fight against COVID-19 has been perpetrated by the EU. There is no excuse. I presume that everyone who reads the Taipei Times knows that the EU has excluded Taiwan from its so-called “safe list,” which permits citizens unhindered travel to and from the countries of the EU. As the EU does not feel that it needs to explain the character of this exclusive list, perhaps we should examine it ourselves in some detail. There are 14 nations on the list that have been chosen as safe countries of origin and safe countries of destination for
Filmmakers in Taiwan used to struggle when it came to telling a story that could resonate internationally. Things started to change when the 2017 drama series The Teenage Psychic (通靈少女), a collaboration between HBO Asia and Taiwanese Public Television Service (PTS), became a huge hit not just locally, but also internationally. The coming-of-age story was adapted from the 2013 PTS-produced short film The Busy Young Psychic (神算). Entirely filmed in Taiwan, the Mandarin-language series even made it on HBO’s streaming platforms in the US. It is proof that a well-told Taiwanese story can absolutely win the hearts and minds of hard-to-please
Drugged with sedatives, handcuffed and wearing a bright orange prison tunic, British fraud investigator and former journalist Peter Humphrey was escorted by warders into an interrogation room filled with reporters, locked inside a steel cage and fastened to a metal “tiger chair.” Humphrey recalls: “I was completely surrounded by officers, dazed, manacled and with cameras pointing at me through the bars. I was fighting for my life like a caged animal. It was horrifying.” Footage from the interrogation was later artfully edited to give the appearance of a confession and broadcast on Chinese state media. While this might sound like an
If anyone had harbored hope that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) was to bring about much-needed reform to his party, those hopes have now been dashed. The pathetic publicity stunt of the KMT’s short-lived “occupation” of the Legislative Yuan on Sunday and Monday last week failed on so many levels, it is difficult to know where to start. Seeing Chiang at the scene was disappointing and raises the question of why he allowed it to happen. The farce began when KMT legislators barricaded themselves into the legislative chamber. However, they were kicked out only 19 hours later, just in