The world’s readiness for the inevitable effects of the climate crisis is “gravely insufficient,” a report from global leaders said.
This lack of preparedness will result in poverty, water shortages and levels of migration soaring, with an “irrefutable toll on human life,” the report by the Global Commission on Adaptation (GCA) said.
The commission, convened by 18 nations including the UK, has contributions from former UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon; Microsoft founder Bill Gates; environment ministers from China, India and Canada; the heads of the World Bank and the UN climate and environment divisions; and others.
Illustration: Mountain People
Trillion-dollar investment is needed to avert “climate apartheid,” where the rich escape the effects and the poor do not, but this investment is far smaller than the eventual cost of doing nothing, the report said, adding that greatest obstacle is not money, but a lack of “political leadership that shakes people out of their collective slumber.”
A “revolution” is needed in how the dangers of global heating are understood and planned for, and solutions are funded, it said.
Among the most urgent actions recommended are early-warning systems of impending disasters, developing crops that can withstand droughts and restoring mangrove swamps to protect coastlines, while other measures include painting roofs of homes white to reduce heatwave temperatures.
In the foreword to the report, Ban, Gates and World Bank president Kristalina Georgieva wrote: “The climate crisis is here, now: massive wildfires ravage fragile habitats, city taps run dry, droughts scorch the land and massive floods destroy people’s homes and livelihoods. So far the response has been gravely insufficient.”
“I am really concerned about the lack of vision of political leaders,” Ban said. “They are much more interested in getting elected and re-elected, and climate issues are not in their priorities. We are seeing this in the US with President [Donald] Trump.”
Severe effects are now inevitable and estimates that unless precautions are taken, 100 million more people could be driven into poverty by 2030, the report said.
The number of people short of water each year would jump by 1.4 billion to 5 billion, causing unprecedented competition for water, fueling conflict and migration, it said.
On the coasts, rising sea levels and storms would drive hundreds of millions from their homes, with costs of US$1 trillion a year by 2050, it said.
“What we truly see is the risk of a climate apartheid, where the wealthy pay to escape and the rest are left to suffer. That is a very profound moral injustice,” GCA chief executive Patrick Verkooijen said.
However, the moral imperative alone would not drive change, he said, and the report also makes an economic case.
“It is a nation’s self-interest to invest in adaptation,” Verkooijen said.
The report estimates spending US$1.8 trillion by 2030 in five key areas could yield US$7.1 trillion in net benefits, by avoiding damages and increasing economic growth.
UK Chair of the Environment Agency Emma Howard Boyd is a member of the GCA.
The agency has warned that England could run short of water within 25 years, and increased coastal and river flooding might force some towns to be abandoned.
In July, the UK government’s official advisers said they were shocked at the lack of proper plans to protect people from the effects of the climate crisis.
“As one of the governments that commissioned this important GCA report, the UK must heed its conclusions about the large economic benefits from adapting to those impacts of climate change that cannot now be avoided,” said Bob Ward, policy director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics.
“This summer has shown that the UK is not adapted to the changing climate of this century, with heavier rainfall and more frequent and intense heatwaves. Successive environment ministers have failed to give this issue the attention it needs, leading to greater damage to lives and livelihoods,” he said.
Cutting carbon emissions is vital, but this has received nearly 20 times more funding than adaptation in recent years, the report said.
Climate effects must be factored into decisions by those who make choices about the future, such as business leaders, it said.
Verkooijen said nations should follow France in making it compulsory for large companies to report the climate risks to their businesses.
Coping with the climate storm
Early warning systems: Just 24 hours’ warning of a coming storm or heatwave can cut the ensuing damage by 30 percent, saving lives and protecting assets worth at least 10 times the cost of the alert system. In Bangladesh, such systems, plus shelters and coastal protection, have already saved hundreds of thousands of lives since the Bhola cyclone in 1970 killed at least 300,000 people.
Climate-ready infrastructure: Such measures can add 3 percent to the upfront costs, but save US$4 for every US$1 spent. Flood protection is key, and Shanghai and other Chinese “sponge cities” are deploying porous pavements, rooftop gardens and trees in parks to soak up water from downpours. Relatively simple measures can also be effective, such as painting roofs with reflective white paint. In the Indian city of Ahmedabad, this has cut temperatures in the rooms below by 5°C.
Mangrove protection: These coastal forests buffer storms, protecting 18 million people and preventing US$80 billion a year in flood damage. They also provide nurseries for fish and tourist attractions worth billions. However, construction, pollution and global heating have destroyed many mangrove forests, from Australia to Mexico. The GCA says the benefits of mangrove preservation and restoration are up to 10 times the cost.
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops