The old adage that there is none so blind as those who will not see is turning into a metaphor for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), especially with regard to its views on Hong Kong and Taiwan.
Today marks a key date for Hong Kong — the fifth anniversary of the “831 Decision” on democratic reforms in the territory. Aug. 31, 2014, was the day the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress adopted a decision that set the limits for the 2016 Legislative Council and 2017 chief executive elections, dashing hopes that the voting rights of Hong Kongers would be expanded and universal suffrage allowed.
The lead-up to that decision and its announcement triggered the Occupy movement, followed by the “Umbrella movement” protests in Hong Kong.
More protests are expected in the territory today, even though rally permits were rejected by police, and despite arrests in the past 48 hours of key players in the Occupy movement and other pro-democracy activists, including Joshua Wong (黃之鋒), Andy Chan (陳浩天), Agnes Chow (周庭), Rick Hui (許銳宇) and Civic Passion lawmaker Cheng Chung-tai (鄭松泰).
All were arrested on charges of rioting or other offenses in connection with this summer’s protests that the Hong Kong government has tried to brand as riots, and while the police yesterday denied that the arrests were timed with today’s anniversary, such statements ring hollow.
As Wong’s Demosisto party said, the arrests were clearly aimed at painting “a picture that the anti-extradition movement was pushed by some masterminds behind the scene, as to neglect the residents’ five demands.”
The CCP has been desperate for someone to blame for the unrest in Hong Kong, regardless of the protests having been avowedly leaderless and widely representative of the territory’s residents.
The idea of a leaderless movement for change has always been beyond the CCP’s comprehension, hence its vicious response to the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, to the silent Falun Gong protest in Beijing in 1999, Charter 08 and so many others.
This blinkered view has long extended to its perceptions of Taiwan as well, going back to the run-up to Taiwan’s first direct presidential elections in 1996.
That Taiwanese would prefer their hard-won democratic system to Beijing’s historic imperative of “longed-for reunification” is not just incomprehensible, it is clearly anathema to the CCP’s leadership.
That Taiwanese feel a kinship for the protesters in Hong Kong and support their calls for greater democracy is not evidence of the involvement of “black hands,” but legitimate support for human rights, and recognition that Beijing’s promises, even its signatures on international treaties, cannot be trusted.
Unfortunately, this means that Taiwanese and other international visitors to China would be advised to be as paranoid as the CCP. They should take only burner phones and clean electronic devices with no history links to Internet accounts or photographs that could be used against them by Chinese authorities.
The disappearance last week of Morrison Lee (李孟居), a 44-year-old Hsinchu native who stopped in Hong Kong before heading to China and then to Indonesia on a business trip has raised concerns that he could end up like Lee Ming-che (李明哲), who went missing in China in 2017 for several weeks before Chinese authorities announced he had been arrested on subversion charges.
According to friends, Morrison Lee had voiced support on Facebook for the Hong Kong protests; his family has not heard from him since he traveled to Shenzhen on Aug. 20.
Lee Ming-che was convicted by a Chinese court for Internet postings he made in Taiwan.
The CCP is blinded by its own ideology. That means Taiwanese, Hong Kongers and everyone else have to keep their eyes wide open.
Lockheed Martin on Tuesday responded to concerns over delayed shipments of F-16V Block 70 jets, saying it had added extra shifts on its production lines to accelerate progress. The Ministry of National Defense on Monday said that delivery of all 66 F-16V Block 70 jets — originally expected by the end of next year — would be pushed back due to production line relocations and global supply chain disruptions. Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that Taiwan and the US are working to resolve the delays, adding that 50 of the aircraft are in production, with 10 scheduled for flight
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,