Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu’s (韓國瑜) recent poor showing in opinion polls has commentators speculating on whether the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) miscalculated when it nominated him as its presidential candidate. Will the party stand by its man or jilt him at this still-early stage?
Han defeated Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) and three others in the KMT primary, but a series of scandals, gaffes and unsubstantiated claims, as well as his controversial decision to run for president just months after persuading Kaohsiung voters he would be their savior, have dented his popularity ratings.
As it stands, Han will be up against President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who is seeking a second term as the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate. Voters would be faced with a relatively simple choice between representatives of the pan-blue and pan-green camps.
However, on Tuesday Gou’s office stated that he is considering running as an independent, and if so, this would complicate matters considerably.
There have been rumblings that Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) might run, and he has suggested that this would please Han, as he could split Tsai’s vote. Ko has said that he would not run if Gou decides to.
Ko is not really a natural fit for either the KMT or the DPP; he might take votes from either. Gou, on the other hand, would seem to be a closer fit to the values of the KMT, which voters have traditionally seen as a better steward of the economy.
He has demonstrated that he is pro-China in purely practical terms, and is a proven success in business, which would recommend him to many. If he stands as an independent, Gou would have the added advantage of being invulnerable to the DPP’s attacks on the KMT and its political baggage.
On balance, then, Gou’s candidacy would probably benefit Tsai more than it would Han. If the KMT wants to prevent another split vote depriving it of the presidency, as happened in 2000, it could abandon Han and nominate Gou as its candidate.
Replacing Han would risk the ire of the core of his fans, who are almost militantly resistant to any suggestion of treason against Han by the party elite. The gamble is that abandoning him might come as relief to KMT members and swing voters hoping for a stable, reliable, substantial candidate standing for the values they attribute to the KMT.
It could also attract undecideds looking for an alternative to the DPP, but who are put off by Han’s shenanigans, lack of governing experience, perceived pro-China proclivities and premature departure from the Kaohsiung mayorship.
Gou has said he does not expect the KMT to abandon Han at this stage, and he is probably right. The party was damaged in 2015 when it replaced former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) with then-New Taipei City mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) as its presidential candidate. It is unlikely to want to repeat that mistake.
Also, Han has confounded the pundits before.
If the KMT sticks to its guns and Han ends up losing the presidential election, it will recover from the defeat. The same would not likely be true for Han.
Defeat could spell the end of his political career: He would almost certainly face a recall vote and even if he survived that, he would find winning re-election extremely challenging.
If he loses the presidential race and the Kaohsiung mayorship, Han would be reduced to nothing within the KMT. He has neither the elitist pedigree nor the seniority that would allow him to just pick up the pieces and brush himself off.
Given Han’s perceived weaknesses, a third candidate, be it Ko, Gou or another — possibly KMT Legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) standing as an independent — would be good for Taiwanese voters and for democracy.
If social media interaction is any yardstick, India remained one of the top countries for Taiwan last year. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has on several occasions expressed enthusiasm to strengthen cooperation with India, one of the 18 target nations in her administration’s New Southbound Policy. The past year was instrumental in fostering Taiwan-India ties and will be remembered for accelerated momentum in bilateral relations. However, most of it has been confined to civil society circles. Even though Taiwan launched its southbound policy in 2016, the potential of Taiwan-India engagement remains underutilized. It is crucial to identify what is obstructing greater momentum
In terms of the economic outlook for the semiconductor industry, Taiwan has outperformed the rest of the world for three consecutive years. This is quite rare. In addition, Taiwan has been playing an important role in the US-China technology dispute, and both want Taiwan on their side, reflecting the remaking of the nation’s semiconductor industry. Under the leadership of — above all — Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the industry as a whole has shifted from a focus on capacity to a focus on quality, as companies now have to be able to provide integration of hardware and software, as well as
In memory of Diane Baker: one of the last working dance journalists, a true dance aficionado and dear friend. On Friday, through a mutual friend, I received the shocking news that dance critic Diane Baker had passed away suddenly at her apartment in Tianmu, Taipei. The news quickly spread, and messages of concern quickly swarmed in from the dance community in Taiwan and abroad. Her sister Sharon in the US later confirmed that Diane died of a heart attack on Wednesday last week. She was 65. Diane was a dear friend to Taiwan’s dance community. Her frequent appearance at dance performances in
US President Joe Biden’s foreign policy on China and the Indo-Pacific region will have huge repercussions for Taiwan. The US Department of State in the final weeks of former US president Donald Trump’s term took several actions clearly aimed to push Biden’s foreign policy to build on Trump’s achievements. Former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo’s announcement on the final day of the Trump administration that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was committing “genocide and crimes against humanity” in Xinjiang was welcome, but comes far too late. The recent dropping of “self-imposed” restrictions on meetings between Taiwanese and US officials was