British supermarkets are starting to go “nude.”
Bowing to pressure from environmentally conscious consumers, big-brand shops have begun taking steps to strip their shelves of plastic wrapping over concerns about saving the oceans from waste.
“Nude zones” and “Food in the nude” campaigns are already being rolled out in places such as New Zealand and South Africa, where many fresh fruits and vegetables are grown within relatively easy reach.
Now retailers in Britain — where even bunches of bananas are often sealed in plastic to keep them fresh and undamaged during long-distance shipping — are gradually following suit.
“I’ve just done my first-ever plastic-free shop,” said May Stirling, who traveled 60km from the village of Ramsbury to Oxford for the university city’s “unpackaging” event at the local Waitrose supermarket.
“It’s so liberating,” the 49-year-old mother said, carrying her own containers for the loose products.
The Oxford branch of the upmarket chain was selling 160 types of vegetables and fruits, plus cereals, grains, couscous, lentils, wine, beer and other items in bulk, in what was initially planned as an 11-week trial.
“I just wish there were a few more things I could have got today,” said Stirling, who added in particular that she would have liked more choice of non-packaged cereals for her son.
Currently, British stores rely greatly on plastic to ship, store and sell items.
The country’s 10-largest grocery chains produce 810,000 tonnes of single-use plastic packaging every year, a figure that does not include bags, Greenpeace and the UK-based Environmental Investigation Agency said in November last year.
Like Stirling, other shoppers have also been pressing the Oxford Waitrose supermarket to do more to stop plastics pollution via a wall, set up by staff, where customers have pinned hundreds of suggestions, many asking for refillable bottles for items like milk and cleaning products.
It has now extended its trial in the branch and announced that it would soon introduce the scheme at three other stores.
However, Waitrose has said that it has yet to establish whether plastic-free zones would work in all of its 344 locations across Britain.
“While the priority is the environmental benefit, we clearly need to ensure [that the trial] is commercially viable,” spokesman James Armstrong said.
Plastic packaging is cheaper than some of the other possible options.
So, are shoppers ready to pay more for their groceries to come wrapped in more ecological packaging?
Fran Scott, a 55-year-old marketing consultant, is unsure.
“I genuinely don’t know,” she said, while also shopping at Waitrose, armed with her own plastic containers.
“I would like to think that,” she added.
Other big supermarket chains have signed up to The UK Plastics Pact.
The pledge’s four tenets include eliminating all single-use packaging and making the remainder recyclable or compostable by 2025.
Tesco and Asda, a low-cost retailer, have promised to stop using plastic for online shopping deliveries.
Morrisons, which like Tesco and Asda is among the five biggest supermarket chains in Britain, intends to install plastic-free produce zones at 60 locations by the end of the year.
Others are going further.
Budgens Belsize Park, a London branch of the smaller supermarket chain Budgens — part of a 147-year-old company of nearly 250 franchises — has already ripped the plastic off more than 2,300 of its 14,000 products.
“We did this to show the other big supermarket chains that it wasn’t as difficult as they said it was,” Andrew Thornton, who runs a Budgens in north London, said of the reorganization, which took 10 weeks.
Among the products still delivered to the shop in plastic is cheese, which staff cut into slices and then re-wrap in clingfilm made of sugarcane.
“If all the big players globally start to deal with this in their own shops and put pressure on the big manufacturers, things will shift,” Thornton said.
Mark Miodownik, a materials scientist at University College London, said that plastic had become a victim of a global business model focused on “disposability and consumption.”
Part of the problem stemmed from the marketing of plastic in the 1960s when it came to symbolize modernity and practicality, Miodownik said.
“Plastic is a great material,” he said, pointing to its advantages for hospital materials, pipes and technological equipment.
He said that plastic is good for packaging too, but only if it can be recycled well.
The British Food Standards Agency notes that plastic limits the exposure of produce to air and moisture, extending its shelf life and “helping to reduce food waste.”
However, Budgens shopper Richard Brady still said that he felt guilty about being caught holding a plastic container of sushi.
“Well, there is nothing else,” he said. “It comes like that and my wife is hungry. It’s up to the supermarket to [make the switch] as opposed to us, isn’t it?”
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS