China has lots of weapons to deploy to bring Hong Kong’s protesters under control before it needs to send in the troops.
From barring dissident flight attendants to encouraging “patriotic” citizens to confront protesters on the streets, China has unloaded a wide range of firepower against the territory’s fractious opposition in the past few weeks. That is to say nothing of the considerable sway Beijing holds over local politics, with its own loyalist bloc in the elected legislature and veto power over all top appointments.
Here is a look at some of the tools in China’s arsenal:
POLITICAL INFLUENCE
While Chinese officials continue to reaffirm their commitment to Hong Kong’s “high degree of autonomy,” they have begun to pull the levers of power more directly since some radical protesters attacked the central government’s local headquarters and other symbols of Beijing’s authority.
The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office — China’s top agency overseeing the territory — has held an unprecedented three briefings on the protests and summoned local representatives to a closed-door meeting in Shenzhen, China, where attendees say officials batted away appeals for compromise.
The moves demonstrate the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) ability to reach deep into the territory’s politics without resorting to military force, even if they reinforce arguments that local control is being eroded.
China has also lodged formal diplomatic complaints with countries that have supported the protests, accusing the US and the UK of meddling.
On Tuesday, it was revealed that a UK consular worker from Hong Kong had been detained while returning from a trip to the mainland earlier this month.
DEPENDENT BUSINESSES
China has repeatedly shown its willingness to use its leverage as the world’s largest trading nation to express political displeasure, as South Korea, Canada, Norway and others can attest.
Hong Kong, which conducts more than 40 percent of its trade via the mainland, is particularly vulnerable.
Last week, Rupert Hogg (何杲) resigned as Cathay Pacific Airways’ chief executive officer after China’s regulators banned all crew who participated in “illegal demonstrations” from mainland flights.
Meanwhile, local tycoons including Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing (李嘉誠), came off the sidelines to publish statements and purchase advertisements urging an end to violent protests.
At the same time, queries on Chinese e-commerce portals, such as Alibaba Group Holding’s Taobao, returned unsuccessful results for people seeking to ship umbrellas, masks and helmets to Hong Kong, where they have become common tools of protesters.
PROPAGANDA MACHINE
Even if Beijing has no intention of deploying troops, it can unleash a vast state-run media apparatus to raise fears that it might.
Chinese media have circulated photographs and reports of Chinese troops and paramilitary riot-control forces training in scenarios resembling Hong Kong’s protests.
The government claims that the protests are the product of foreign “black hands” such as the US and the UK are widely circulated, helping lay the ground for any more direct intervention.
Moreover, the uglier parts of the protests, such as petrol bombs thrown at police stations or the defacement of national emblems, are amplified for most of the mainland’s 1.4 billion citizens. Reports have frequently compared the protests to “terrorists” and “rioters” — a label used to justify the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989.
Beijing’s nationwide censorship system known as the Great Firewall helps ensure that developments that might generate sympathy for the movement, including outbreaks of beatings by triad-linked mobs, go largely unmentioned.
’UNITED FRONT’
Long before regaining control over Hong Kong in 1997, the CCP built a deep support network that it can call for support in times of trouble, including business groups, labor unions, neighborhood associations and several pro-establishment political parties.
This “United Front” plays a key role in organizing counterprotests to support the police and the government, events that receive favorable play in the territory’s numerous Beijing-aligned commercial media outlets.
The growing global reach of such groups — ostensibly aimed at overseas Chinese — has drawn accusations of political meddling in places such as Canada and Australia, where they have turned out to oppose causes disputed by Beijing.
The groups have helped China counter rallies organized around the globe to support Hong Kong’s protests, seen by clashes in Sydney and Melbourne on Friday last week. Canadian police on Sunday last week escorted worshipers out of a Vancouver church, after Beijing supporters surrounded a prayer meeting for Hong Kong.
TRIAD SUPPORT
While the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office has urged an end to all violence in the protests, the agency has also urged Hong Kong residents to “stand firm and guard our beautiful homeland,” and warned demonstrators that “those who play with fire will perish by it.”
Such comments have fueled concern that Beijing is at least tolerant of other, more aggressive moves against protesters.
In the past few weeks, groups of stick-wielding men, often dressed in matching white shirts, have turned out on the streets to assault protesters. People have shot fireworks at rallies from passing cars.
On Tuesday, a man was arrested while attempting to enter the mainland in connection with a knife attack on three people near a protest message wall.
Protesters and opposition lawmakers have blamed the attacks on notorious Chinese organized crime gangs known as triads, and police said that several people with links to the groups were among those arrested after one particular shocking attack last month.
They have accused the police of colluding with the gangs, something the Hong Kong government has denied.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of