As a professor of political science, I am often invited to analyze public opinion polls, so I am often among the first to see the results of surveys. I have been doing this for years, and based on my experience, poll results in Taiwan are full of strange surprises. A look at the slew of polls released last week on prospects for the presidential election on Jan. 11 next year would leave one wondering which one really reflects public opinion.
The Formosa online news service appointed Beacon Marketing and Research to conduct a survey on New Taipei City residents’ support for prospective presidential candidates. According to this survey, in a duel between President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the Democratic Progressive Party and Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Tsai would be the winner with a support rate of 41.5 percent against Han’s 36.2 percent. If Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were added as a third candidate, the three contenders would have about equal support.
These results are similar to those of a poll conducted at about the same time by the Green Party Taiwan, except that the Green Party poll gave Tsai a bigger lead over Han at 7 percentage points and put Tsai 5 percentage points ahead of Han in a three-way contest.
The Taiwan New Constitution Foundation, which was established at the end of last year, appointed Trend Survey to do its survey. The results, announced on Aug. 7, showed that Tsai would trounce Han by 51 percent to 31.2 percent in a two-way vote and she would still be far ahead if Ko were added to the mix.
The Chinese-language Apple Daily appointed Statinc to conduct a poll whose results were announced at about the same time. This poll found that there would not be much of a gap between Tsai and Han in a two-way race, but if Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) were to join the fray with Ko as his running mate, Gou would be ahead of both Tsai and Han. Interestingly, if only the results from landline interviews are counted, Gou’s lead over Han goes up to 6 percentage points. Ironically, was it not Gou who suggested some time ago that a purely landline-based poll would be unfair to him?
At the same time, the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum appointed Taiwan Real Survey to conduct the same kind of poll. This survey put Han ahead of his rivals in a three-way and a four-way contest, but had him leading by the smallest margin in a race between Tsai, Han and Gou.
Within the space of one week, these companies announced completely different results for a three-way race, including wins for Tsai, Gou and Han, or a dead heat for all three. The results put the candidates in just about every possible order.
Given that each of the commissioning organizations has a clear-cut political standpoint, it is reasonable to wonder whether the results have some political purpose other than reflecting public opinion. However, credibility and scientific methods are the basic principles that polling organizations depend on for their existence, so are they willing to sacrifice their credibility to meet clients’ demands?
These companies should bear in mind that surveys on electoral support rates will eventually be put to the test by the actual election. All will be revealed on the day the votes are counted. Are they not worried that the election results will cause the public to question the way the polls were conducted? Maybe they assume that people will have forgotten by then.
Taiwan is an island, and not a very big one, but a rough estimate puts the number of opinion poll companies at more than 20. Each of these companies has considerable operating costs, but given the fierce competition, their asking price for conducting a survey has hardly ever gone up. It is easy to imagine how tough it must be in their line of business.
Besides, there are not many contracts available, and independent polling companies face competition from polls conducted by academic institutions and the media. It is not hard to imagine that polling company operators, for the sake of getting work and staying in business, might lower their standards by bending results to meet their clients’ requirements. That would explain why there is only one public opinion, but all kinds of poll results.
Given this situation, Taiwanese have to do a bit more homework than voters in other countries. Whenever election results come out, people need to look back and compare them with the forecasts made by polling companies. They can then use social media to tell everyone about the pollsters that got their forecasts badly wrong, so that they will get kicked out of the market.
Unless public opinion rises up against misleading polls, it will always be a tool that political hacks use to manipulate and mislead people.
Yang Tai-shuenn is a professor in Chinese Culture University’s Graduate School of Political Science.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In 1955, US general Benjamin Davis Jr, then-commander of the US’ 13th Air Force, drew a maritime demarcation line in the middle of the Taiwan Strait, known as the median line. Under pressure from the US, Taiwan and China entered into a tacit agreement not to cross the line. On July 9, 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) described cross-strait relations as a “special state-to-state” relationship. In response, Beijing dispatched People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft into the Taiwan Strait, crossing the median line for the first time since 1955. The PLA has begun to regularly traverse the line. On Sept. 18 and 19, it
Midday in Manhattan on Wednesday, September 16, was sunny and mild. Even with the pandemic’s “social distancing” it was a perfect day for “al fresco” dining with linen tablecloths and sidewalk potted palms outside one of New York City’s elegant restaurants. Two members of the press, outfitted with digital SLR cameras and voice recorders, were dispatched by The Associated Press to cover a rare outdoor diplomatic meeting on one of these New York streets. American diplomat Kelly Craft, Chief of the United States Mission to the United Nations, lunched in the open air with Taiwan’s ambassador-ranked representative in New York, James
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) recently declared that aggression and expansionism have never been in the Chinese nation’s “genes.” It is almost astonishing that he managed to say it with a straight face. Aggression and expansionism obviously are not genetic traits, but they have defined Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) tenure. Xi, who in some ways has taken up the expansionist mantle of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), is attempting to implement a modern version of the tributary system that Chinese emperors used to establish authority over vassal states: submit to the emperor, and reap the benefits of peace and
Unlike its previous practice of disclosing the latest activities of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in a press release, the Ministry of National Defense has in the past few weeks followed the model of the Japanese Ministry of Defense. When carrying out surveillance and reconnaissance of the nation’s waters and airspace, it has posted real-time military activity updates on its Chinese-language Web site, explaining with text and graphs the responses and measures taken by the nation’s armed forces. The disclosed information on PLA activities show that the military is capable of maintaining regional security and safeguarding a free and open