DPP-KMT primaries flawed
The recent presidential nominee selection processes conducted by the Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lacked transparency. Both were conducted out of the view of the electorate, behind closed doors.
The two parties’ constant changing of the selection process and rescheduling created confusion and distrust among the electorate.
Many voters that I talked to admitted that the perpetual going back and forth frustrated their attempt to understand the selection process.
Allies of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), led by DPP Chairman Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰), repeatedly rescheduled the process to ensure that Tsai secured the nomination.
Ultimately, 15,000 telephone surveys were conducted, asking respondents which candidate they favored. One-half of the surveys were conducted on landlines and the other on mobile phones.
The KMT process was allegedly manipulated due to pressures that favored Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜).
It too was finally carried out on the basis of 15,000 phone interviews. However, all of the calls were made to landlines, which are thought to be the choice of older voters who favor Han; mobile phones, preferred by younger voters, were not used.
Tsai’s opponent, former premier William Lai (賴清德), felt the DPP’s process was stacked against him.
Two of the KMT’s candidates, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) and KMT Legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), felt that the KMT’s process was unfair and gave preference to Han.
As a result, the unity in both the DPP and the KMT has suffered.
Given that the total voter tally for the 2016 presidential and legislative elections was 12.5 million people, surveys conducted by the two parties lacked representativeness.
Taiwan needs a nationwide primary election, held on a specific day during a predetermined time period, and conducted by the Central Election Commission. That would make the primary process more representative, open, transparent, understandable and democratic.
In a statement that came as a shock to many, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Saturday announced the immediate annulment of all “self-imposed” guidelines on US executive relations with Taiwan, which he said Washington took “unilaterally, in an attempt to appease the Communist regime in Beijing.” It could be the most sweeping advancement in Taiwan-US ties in decades. No longer would officials need to meet in “private meeting rooms or restaurants,” or avoid references to a Taiwanese country or government. High-level personnel could attend official events, including Double Ten National Day celebrations. Coverage of the decision has been predictably alarmist,
The year 2020 will go down in history. Certainly, if for nothing else, it will be remembered as the year of the COVID-19 pandemic and the continuing impact it has had on the world. All nations have had to deal with it; none escaped. As a virus, COVID-19 has known no bounds. It has no agenda or ideology; it champions no cause. There is no way to bully it, gaslight it or bargain with it. Impervious to any hype, posturing, propaganda or commands, it ignores such and simply attacks. All nations, big or small, are on a level playing field
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s announcement on Saturday that the US was to drop self-imposed restrictions on meetings between senior Taiwanese and US officials had immediate real-world effects. On Monday, US Ambassador to the Netherlands Pete Hoekstra met Representative to the Netherlands Chen Hsing-hsing (陳欣新) at the US embassy in The Hague, with both noting on social media the historic nature of this seemingly modest event. Modest perhaps, but their meeting would have been impossible before Pompeo’s announcement. Some have welcomed this move, thinking that it is long-overdue and a step in the right direction to normalizing relations between
The US’ relationships with its core democratic partners are set to rebound dramatically after US president-elect Joe Biden takes office. Allies in Europe and Asia relish the prospect of a US president committed to adhering to democratic traditions at home, honor strategic commitments abroad, and be a team player. Solidarity among the world’s democracies is especially important when it comes to standing up to China. The EU’s decision last week to sign an investment accord with that country underscores the potential for serious discord. Even though the Biden camp cautioned the EU against moving ahead with the agreement, it nonetheless sealed the