The Executive Yuan is moving toward abolishing the stamp tax, to the joy of local businesses, but local governments have raised concerns over the move, as the levy is a major source of income for them.
Local Chinese-language media last week reported that Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) approved a bill proposed by the Ministry of Finance to scrap the controversial tax. If the Legislative Yuan approves draft amendments to the Stamp Tax Act (印花稅法) in the coming legislative session, the levy could be lifted as early as next year.
The government promulgated the act on Dec. 8, 1934, making it one of the oldest taxes in the nation. After dozens of amendments, only four types of documents remain subject to the stamp tax: receipts for certain monetary payments; contracts to perform a specific job or task; contracts for the sale of movable properties; and contracts for the sale, transfer and subdivision of real estate.
Even so, local industry representatives have for the past 20 years lobbied against the levy, arguing that it overlaps with the value-added business tax.
On the other hand, increasingly complex transaction types and a wide variety of documents have added to the cost of tax collection for the government, as it must use more administrative orders to identify taxable documents, while taxpayers are more likely to avoid paying it, as they often feel at a loss for what to do. Over the past few decades, several governments considered phasing out the tax, but failed, due to political and economic factors.
In late May, members of the Chinese National Association of Industry and Commerce, one of the major trade organizations in the nation, met with Su and recommended that the government scrap the tax, as collecting it and the business tax results in double taxation.
Apparently, the government heeded the association’s proposal this time around, but few details about the bill are known, while people wonder how the government will cover the cost and help local governments make up for shortfalls in tax revenue.
The revenue generated from stamp tax last year totaled NT$12.1 billion (US$385.8 million), or only 0.5 percent of the nation’s total tax revenue of NT$2.39 trillion, so abolishing it would not negatively affect the state coffers, but could lessen the burden on taxpayers.
However, the move to abolish it has perturbed many local government heads, who last week demanded that the central government first implement supporting measures and designate alternative income sources.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), meanwhile, has perceived the matter as a campaign tactic by the Democratic Progressive Party to win next year’s presidential and legislative elections.
The key to abolishing the levy is finding a replacement income source for local governments. This could be achieved through amending the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) to ensure fair allocation of resources to local governments, using part of the central government’s annual budget to make up revenue shortfalls, or raising business taxes.
Before reaching a final decision, the Executive Yuan should gauge the feasibility of the proposals and discuss the matter with lawmakers and local governments.
However, the books cannot be balanced by robbing Peter to pay Paul. The government needs to follow fiscal discipline if it abolishes the stamp duty. More importantly, it must find a way to make the whole pie bigger, which means boosting economic growth and thus increasing overall tax revenue, and developing a more sound tax system, with abolishing the stamp tax being the first step toward a bigger tax reform.
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS