They smashed glass windows, sprayed rude graffiti and defaced Hong Kong’s official emblem with black paint, but of all the dramatic photographs showing hundreds of young protesters storming the Hong Kong Legislative Council building last week, one image makes for particularly uncomfortable viewing in Beijing: The British colonial flag draped aloft a podium in the council chamber.
That is not all. On a day supposed to celebrate the 22nd anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to the “motherland,” other protesters were pictured defiantly flying giant Union Flags in the Legislative Council.
Why are some protesters — many of them millennials — harking back to a bygone colonial era, two decades after Britain handed the territory over to China as a semi-autonomous territory?
“Does it really mean that people seriously want colonial rule again? No, but I don’t think there’s any dispute among protesters that British rule was better than what we’ve got after the handover, especially in recent years,” Hong Kong journalist Lam Yin Pong (林彥邦) said.
“There might be some element of a rose-tinted lens. Perhaps some people are fantasizing about the ‘good old days,’ but what’s clear is that under colonial rule there was never a clear feeling of freedoms being gradually eroded, of a series of government actions completely against our interests,” he said.
Hong Kong has been rocked by massive street protests and its most serious political crisis after its government tried to push through legislation that would allow suspects in crimes to be extradited to mainland China for trial.
The proposed bills have triggered broader fears that China is chipping away at the freedoms and rights that Hong Kong was guaranteed for 50 years after its July 1, 1997, handover to Beijing under a “one country, two systems” deal.
Its constitution, the Basic Law, promised that Hong Kong voters should ultimately achieve universal suffrage, a goal that Beijing has pushed back indefinitely. That has long caused widespread resentment, especially among the territory’s increasingly disenfranchised young people, but Hong Kong never enjoyed democracy under 155 years of British rule, either.
Governors at the time were appointed in London and legislators were not directly elected to the Legislative Council until 1991. Most of the council’s seats were either appointed or chosen by powerful professional groups.
The territory’s last British governor, Chris Patten, managed to push through democratic reforms only in the final years before his 1997 departure.
Even so, Britain was — and still is — widely seen in Hong Kong as a beacon of Western-style civil liberties and the rule of law, leaving a legacy of independent courts, a well-oiled civil service and institutions such as an anti-corruption watchdog. The colonial years saw steady economic growth and its free-market policies meant the territory flourished as one of the world’s leading business hubs.
“I miss the British-Hong Kong government before 1997. The British helped us build a lot of things: separation of powers, our rule of law, our entire social system,” said Alexandra Wong (王鳳瑤 ), 63, a protester who has often been seen raising the Union Flag at demonstrations and carried one into the Legislative Council building on Monday last week.
“What I can do is to hopefully encourage young people to continue to persist” in fighting for their rights, she said.
It helped that Patten and his administration showed a gift for connecting with the populace and are remembered fondly by many to this day.
“He projected complete commitment to the people. People could feel he wanted to be on their side,” said Leo Goodstadt, a British economics professor and chief policy adviser to the colonial government from 1989 to 1997.
By contrast, Patten’s Chinese successors all suffered dismal popularity ratings — none more so than current Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥).
Recent polls show that under her leadership, trust in Beijing and feelings of identification with China have plunged.
Lam’s administration is widely seen as inept and arrogantly out of touch with public sentiment, bulldozing through unpopular policies with no regard for widespread opposition.
Many in the territory see police violence against protesters in recent weeks as marking a new low for a government seen to be oblivious to residents’ rights.
“At least 1 million people have taken to the streets, but they keep refusing to listen,” Lam Yin Pong said. “Never mind the British — any rational, civilized government would have backed off.”
Some say the protesters’ raising of the colonial-era and Union Flags was a deliberate message for the world — especially Britain — to do more to uphold the democratic values they symbolize. Patten recently called for Britain to fulfill its “duty to help Hong Kong out of this dark moment.”
Both of Britain’s two leading prime ministerial candidates have made a point of stressing solidarity with Hong Kong’s protesters and British media have featured the news prominently.
Benedict Rogers, a human rights activist who heads the group Hong Kong Watch, said he has been encouraged that the Hong Kong question is receiving much more attention in the British parliament.
“We need to sustain this,” Rogers said. “Britain must take a lead in the international community and mobilize other countries to send a strong united message to allow Hong Kong’s freedoms to be preserved.”
However, it is not clear if Britain has the appetite to take steps beyond offering words of concern and condemnation — or if the flags have had the opposite effect of hardening Beijing’s stance against the territory.
In an escalating war of words, British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Jeremy Hunt, in the running to be Britain’s next leader, has warned China not to use the Hong Kong protests as a “pretext for repression.”
He threatened “serious consequences” if China failed to honor the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration upholding Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy — although he stopped short of spelling out any measures.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs shot back, dismissing Hunt’s comments as “shameless” posturing and meddling, and mocked him for “basking in the faded glory of British colonialism.”
Kerry Brown, director of the Lau China Institute at King’s College London, said the question now is what the US and Europe would do.
“Right now it’s mostly just rhetoric and it’s not likely to get to the situation where the UK can unilaterally do anything beyond the symbolic,” Brown said.
Certainly not everyone in Hong Kong sees things as better in the colonial days — although some believe that the more widespread political apathy back then is no bad thing compared with the turmoil today.
“Back in the day, there was no one involved in political issues, everyone was politically apathetic... I don’t understand the reason why there are so many political demands after the handover,” said a Chinese medicine shop owner, who gave only his surname, Chan. “Everyone can say anything now. I don’t see there is no freedom. The time when our government was British, I think we didn’t have that much autonomy.”
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to