Students expose Han
At several school graduation ceremonies at the end of last month, students criticized or made fun of Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who is contesting the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential primary, as he presented awards and posed with the winners.
It was a pleasure to see the students’ frankness. The brief conversations they had with him, unhindered by political considerations, exposed Han’s true personality on television.
Members of the older generation can definitely learn something from these events.
On one occasion, a student told Han: “Your presidential bid is outright ridiculous.”
Another student wore a T-shirt that read: “Run away,” a swipe at Han for attending campaign rallies instead of concentrating on his job as mayor, and a third posed with Han while holding the Chinese-language version of the book The Lying Ape.
The students deserve credit for their creativity, humor and truthfulness.
Those of us who grew up in the previous century had to put up with restrictions imposed by schools based on the prevailing framework, which included a greater-China outlook and was replete with the ideology of Confucian ethics. Students were only supposed to study, not to raise questions about worldly affairs. It would have been a great honor for them to have their photo taken with a senior official. They had no business knowing, nor any opportunity to know, whether leaders’ actions matched their words, still less did they know the meaning of “political hack.”
The new generation of students live in an atmosphere of freedom and democracy, and they have ready access to plentiful sources of information. Their grades might not be outstanding, but most of them can say a thing or two about current affairs. For this generation, there is no great honor in getting a pat on the head from a high-up official or to pose for a photo with one. They might even complain that it is a waste of time. Such is the generation gap.
Because of that generation gap, my generation mocks young people as being soft and always complaining, while youngsters complain that we are always harping on about “the good old days.”
Model students have shown their creativity in these “performances” with Han. We members of older generations have to admit that their choice of words is not just simple and straightforward, but in tune with the public’s perception of Han.
They have the courage, which we might not have, to show Han for what he really is.
There is no need for us to encourage the students’ spontaneous actions. We can just let them be creative, whether we agree with them or not. From the moment the first student called Han’s presidential bid “ridiculous,” we should take a good look at ourselves. Han presents himself as being as down-to-earth as a bowl of noodles, but he has tens of millions of New Taiwan dollars in the bank. Is this really the right kind of person to invite to present awards to students? Or are these ceremonies just photo opportunities for his presidential campaign? Perhaps the students know better than us.
Wu Hsin-chieh
Penghu County
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when