Hong Kongers seek asylum
Hong Kong’s proposed extradition law and Beijing’s political intervention: Why a rising number of Hong Kong citizens will seek asylum overseas.
I am writing in response to two leaders and members of Hong Kong Indigenous, Ray Wong (黃台仰), 25, and Alan Li (李東昇), 27, becoming the first political advocates from Hong Kong seeking asylum in a foreign country.
I would like to explain why the proposal of extradition law will plausibly result in a rising number of Hong Kong citizens applying for asylum in foreign countries.
In recent years, Beijing has progressively been restricting Hong Kong’s right to democracy. Here, it is noteworthy that Beijing has denied Hong Kong citizens’ right to universal suffrage, in addition to banning the pro-independence party, Hong Kong National Party, in September last year.
Hong Kongers have always denounced Beijing’s political intervention, which bars us from maximizing our civil rights.
However, nowadays the political and civil profile in Hong Kong has changed. Local citizens should no longer be arguing whether the coming generations can fully enjoy civil rights, but whether dissent against Beijing would be allowed.
Hong Kong authorities have reiterated that any prosecution against political criminal offenders will be absent under a proposed extradition law.
Yet, Hong Kongers are predisposed to believe that pro-democracy advocates, journalists and other dissidents would be extradited to mainland China once the proposal is passed.
Mainland China is known for its notorious and opaque legal and criminal system, in which individuals can be victimized by arbitrary detentions, forced confessions, torture and closed criminal trials.
The unfair and unjust legal and criminal system terrifies Hong Kong citizens in the respect of safety and freedom concerns if the proposed extradition law is put into force.
Unlike mainland China, Hong Kong is subject to the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
Any form of extradition that imposes risk of torture, other forms of ill-treatment and unfair trials must be prohibited.
Without full respect for civil and political rights against, potential or actual, inhumane treatment, the Hong Kong government’s proposed extradition law curtails local citizens’ trust in government.
If the law goes through, an increasing number of anti-Beijing dissidents from Hong Kong, akin to Wong and Li, would seek asylum in foreign countries.
Hong Kong: Home “bitter” home?
Jason Hung
London
‘Chimerica’ recalls massacre
Being isolated from the outside world, most people in China are unaware that the Tiananmen Square Massacre’s 30th anniversary is approaching.
However, British TV series Chimerica attempts to recall the ruthless and violent incident.
Chimerica, adapted from playwright Lucy Kirkwood’s 2013 play, arrived on the small screen on Channel 4 in April. Its plot is inspired by the famous “Tank Man” photograph, selected as one of the most influential images of all time by Time magazine, taken the day after Chinese military suppressed the Tiananmen Square protest in 1989.
In the four-episode TV show, a photojournalist, Lee Berger, travels to China in the hope of discovering the truth behind this photograph.
Alongside the historical clips and photos woven into it, Chimerica reveals problems, such as severe air pollution, telephone and Internet tapping, restricted Internet access and suppression of human rights, which all exist in he contemporary Chinese society.
There is no doubt Chimerica has touched a raw nerve at the Chinese government and has definitely been prohibited in China.
Ever since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took power, China’s public opinion and online activities have been under closer monitoring.
The patriotic education system is another measure for the government to brainwash and reshape history into a favorable story.
From facts such as detention camps in Xinjiang region, facial recognition systems and ubiquitous surveillance cameras, and the strict censorship of all media and social networks, it is obvious that Xi is tightening his control on the public.
From another angle, we might assume that this reflects his lack of confidence to rule the country under the pressure of an economic slowdown, instability inside the Chinese Communist Party and grievances from all walks of life.
It is expected that the hardliner Xi will increase the public control measures to consolidate his power.
Nonetheless, it is also a vision that one day people in China will break free from the autocratic shackles.
Huang Juiching
Taoyuan
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS