Ministry of Education figures released on Monday show that the number of teachers found to have sexually assaulted or harassed students at public schools has increased, with 83 suspected sexual assault cases reported last year alone.
K-12 Education Administration Division of Student Affairs and Campus Security head Lin Liang-ching (林良慶) said the issue has to do with an unbalanced power dynamic between teachers and students, which is true in most sexual offenses. However, his suggestion that teachers know where to draw the line when it comes to advances from students oversimplifies the problem.
Even if a person in their early 20s is teaching a third-year high-school class, they should consider themselves the students’ guide and mentor, rather than a peer. Failure to think this way indicates that the teacher is not mature enough to be head of a classroom, whether due to insufficient training or mental unpreparedness. If a teacher is aware of the distinction between themselves and the students, but engages in a relationship with a student regardless, this could mean they are taking advantage of their authority — meaning they are a threat and should not be in the classroom.
An article published on the Psychology Today Web site on Nov. 14, 2017, said that “when someone rapes, assaults or harasses, the motivation stems from the perpetrator’s need for dominance and control.”
As Lin said: “There is no such thing as a student-teacher romance.” No relationship between a teacher and a school student is acceptable.
However, some cases are never reported. This could be for many reasons: The student is in shock and unable to act, the teacher could be threatening to fail the student if they report them, or the student might feel that nobody would believe them.
Perpetrators often “confuse and control [victims] by dangling enticements with one hand and wielding threats, implied or explicit, with the other,” the article said.
It is not unreasonable for a student to be concerned that they might not be believed.
Humanistic Education Foundation executive director Joanna Feng (馮喬蘭) said that a common response by parents when allegations of assault surface is to question whether their child did anything to create a misunderstanding.
Author Lin Yi-han (林奕含), who committed suicide two years ago and who was thought to have been sexually assaulted by a teacher, never came forward about the assault. The allegations only arose after her book on the topic was published and her subsequent suicide.
To tackle abuse of children at schools, the threat must be removed before incidents occur.
An article published by online journal Phi Delta Kappan on Sept. 24 last year suggested a tiered approach. Teachers’ colleges could be required to provide better training on “appropriate professional boundaries, as well as bystander responsibility.”
Schools could also improve screening of candidates by asking open-ended questions during interviews about student-teacher relationships and when it is appropriate to touch a child. Schools could also use training partners who have expertise in sexual abuse prevention to work with schools on guidelines, help train part-time and full-time instructors, and assist schools to establish supervisory mechanisms, the article said.
Schools could ensure that teachers are not left alone with students, and that any suspicious activity witnessed by fellow teachers — including teachers providing transport for students or spending an excessive amount of time with them — be reported.
Teachers are invaluable in contributing to a child’s development, but a safe environment is needed for good educators, as well as for students.
In a Facebook post on Wednesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) wrote: “The KMT must fall for Taiwan to improve.’ Allow me to ask the question again: Is this really true?” It matters not how many times Hsu asks the question, my answer will always be the same: “Yes, the KMT must be toppled for Taiwan to improve.” In the lengthy Facebook post, titled “What were those born in the 1980s guilty of?” Hsu harked back to the idealistic aspirations of the 2014 Sunflower movement before heaping opprobrium on the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP)
The scuffle between Chinese embassy staffers in Fiji and a Taiwanese diplomat at a Republic of China (ROC) Double Ten National Day celebration has turned into a public relations opportunity for the government, Beijing and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Although the incident occurred on Oct. 8, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) downplayed it, only for the story to be picked up by the foreign media, forcing the ministry to respond. The public and opposition parties asked why the government had failed to remonstrate more strongly in the first instance. It is still unclear whether the ministry missed a trick
US President Donald Trump and his Democratic rival, former US vice president Joe Biden, are holding their final debate tonight. In their foreign policy debate, China is sure to be a major issue of contention for the two candidates. Here are several questions the moderator should pose to the candidates: For both: In the first televised US presidential debates in 1960, then-Democratic candidate John F. Kennedy and his Republican counterpart, Richard Nixon, were asked whether the US should intervene if communist China attacked Taiwan’s outlying islands of Kinmen and Matsu. Kennedy said no, unless the main island of Taiwan was also attacked.
For most of us, the colorful, otherworldly marinescapes of coral reefs are as remote as the alien landscapes of the moon. We rarely, if ever, experience these underwater wonderlands for ourselves — we are, after all, air-breathing, terrestrial creatures mostly cocooned in cities. It is easy not to notice the perilous state they are in: We have lost 50 percent of coral reefs in the past 20 years and more than 90 percent are expected to die by 2050, a presentation at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Diego, California, earlier this year showed. As the oceans heat further and