The command center at the Otto Junker GmbH metals plant stands in sharp contrast to the noisy and smelly factory floor, where until just a few weeks ago workers operated various machines individually. The new digs are quiet, there is no oil stench and there is even room for a coffee maker. The downside? The control room boss might end up drinking that coffee alone, because running the machines requires just one person, down from about a half-dozen.
The 95-year-old company — in the town of Simmerath, just a few hundred meters from the Belgian border — is preparing for storm clouds gathering over German industry.
Chief executive officer Bernward Reif says Otto Junker, which builds furnaces that can melt tonnes of metal in minutes, must adapt to a changing economy by improving the productivity of its 480 employees. That has spurred him to propose initiatives like building the control room and shifting more work to its facility in the Czech Republic, while investing in technologies such as 3D printing and wireless apps.
“The environment is more volatile,” Reif says as he passes freshly cast metal pumps that are still too hot to touch. “It means we have to become more productive and flexible.”
Like Junker, companies from tiny family-owned engineering specialists to global giants such as Volkswagen are doing what they have long done: transforming themselves to meet the demands of a shifting global order.
However, this time, the stakes seem higher, as the world is riven by trade conflicts and as value moves from old-school engineering — Germany’s traditional strength — to digital technologies.
The country’s export-focused industrial base, the motor of its growth, today is becoming a disadvantage. Faced with the challenges posed by US President Donald Trump’s “America first” protectionism and China’s slowdown, the country is at greater risk than, say, neighboring France, because of Germany’s greater reliance on selling manufactured goods.
The longer-term challenges might be even more vexing. Transport infrastructure is crumbling, data networks are patchy, the population will start shrinking in the coming decade and the crucial auto industry risks getting sidelined by the emergence of self-driving electric vehicles.
“On top of the normal level of investment, they’ve got the additional demand of trying to find the right answer for these new technologies,” says Peter Wells, a professor at Cardiff Business School who studies global auto manufacturing. “German industry has been quite firmly in denial about the prospects for electric cars” and now is trying to catch up.
The strains are undeniable.
The European Central Bank on Thursday last week announced a new stimulus program and cut its forecast for this year, predicting expansion of just 1.1 percent. Germany narrowly avoided a recession at the end of last year after automotive bottlenecks from emissions changes caused a contraction in the third quarter and growth this year is forecast to be the weakest since 2013 — spurring the government to propose a national industrial policy for the first time in German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s 14 years in power.
Still, Germany has a strong track record of adaptation. It emerged from the ashes of World War II to become the industrial powerhouse of Europe and the integration of the communist East after the fall of the Berlin Wall 30 years ago has been largely successful. Its labor force is among the world’s most efficient and skilled, and its education system includes 10 universities on the Times Higher Education rankings of the world’s top 100 universities.
“We have an amazing wealth of possibilities in Germany, which I’d venture to say doesn’t exist anywhere else,” says Joachim Schulz, CEO of Aesculap, a manufacturer of surgical tools such as scalpels, forceps and bone saws.
Schulz says that is evident in Tuttlingen, where the company is headquartered, about 25km north of the Swiss border. The town of 36,000 is home to about 400 medical tech companies, providing a deep pool of potential workers, especially if, like Aesculap, you are the biggest player in town, with 3,600 employees there.
The pressure is especially intense in the automotive sector, where manufacturers and component makers alike are scrambling to adapt. Schaeffler AG is cutting 700 jobs in Germany in an overhaul of its parts business aimed at reducing reliance on the combustion engine. To boost its expertise in driver-assistance, transmission specialist ZF Friedrichshafen AG is in talks to buy Wabco Holdings Inc for about US$9 billion. Continental AG is considering a sale of part of its powertrain business to increase investment in electronics.
The most radical changes are under way at Volkswagen, which is still recovering from its 2015 emissions cheating scandal that tarnished both the company’s image and the broader Made in Germany brand. The world’s largest automaker says it will spend US$50 billion to develop scores of battery-powered vehicles by 2025 and retool factories to build them.
For instance, a factory in Dresden — a bright and airy space originally set up for the Phaeton, an ill-fated luxury sedan meant to showcase VW’s engineering prowess — has shifted to assembly of electric variants of the Golf hatchback. Last year, the facility hit a production record.
This winter, the government proposed its industrial strategy in response to fears that Germany will get squeezed out by the US and China as the global economy shifts to new technologies. The program calls for defending German leadership in key sectors like metals and machinery, and investing in technologies such as artificial intelligence, which the report calls likely the most important development since the steam engine.
“We’ve spent too much time discussing the small questions facing this country and not enough time on the big questions,” German Minister of Economic Affairs Peter Altmaier said at the presentation of the program last month in Berlin. “It’s about whether the enormous affluence we’ve achieved over the last 70 years can be maintained and expanded.”
President-elect Biden and his team soon will confront a raging pandemic, a severe economic crisis, demands for progress in addressing racial injustices, intensifying climate-induced crises, and strained relations with allies and partners in many parts of the world. They will be oriented to view China as America’s greatest geostrategic challenge, but not the most immediate threat to the health and prosperity of the American people. Amidst this daunting inheritance, US-Taiwan relations will stand out as a bright spot, an example of progress that should be sustained. There are strong reasons for optimism about the continued development of US-Taiwan relations in the
Beijing’s imposition of the Hong Kong National Security Law and a number of other democratic and human rights issues continue to strain relations between the UK and China. The tense situation has significantly decreased the likelihood of British Royal Navy ships being able to continue their practice of docking in Hong Kong’s harbor for resupply — a not altogether unpredictable development. In a Nov. 19 online speech to parliament, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced that the HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier would next year lead a British and allied task group to the Mediterranean, Indian Ocean and East Asia. Johnson
Americans tend to think of Vietnam as a war that split the US rather than as a country in today’s world. Vietnamese are of course way past that. The country does not have any US Electoral College votes, but if it did, they would be cast enthusiastically for US President Donald Trump. When I told a group of university students at a park in Ho Chi Minh City that I was from the US, they asked: “Do you know why we love Trump?” “Uhhh, is it because he hates China?” I asked back. “Yeah,” the group responded in unison. With a 1,000-year history of
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office on Wednesday announced that Shih Cheng-ping (施正屏), a retired National Taiwan Normal University professor, who Beijing says is a spy, had been sentenced to four years in prison for espionage crimes. The news followed last week’s announcement by Beijing that it is compiling a “wanted list” of pro-independence “Taiwan secessionists” that would be used to “punish” those blacklisted under its national security laws. Taken together, the announcements show that Beijing’s Taiwan policy under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is becoming increasingly erratic, uncoordinated and poorly thought out, which raises serious questions about Xi’s leadership ability. Shih went missing