Locks need more reflection
The article on the possible imposition of ignition locks for recidivist drunk drivers points out some of the serious problems related to the idea, most notably the non-existence of ignition locks for motorcycles and scooters (“Government mulls ignition locks for drunk drivers,” Feb. 26, page 1).
However, there is a hidden issue that does not appear to be mentioned. The statement that “the executive Yuan is mulling legislation that would require recidivist drunk drivers to install ignition interlocks in their cars” makes no sense because in Taiwan a large fraction of accidents involve drivers that do not own the car they drive, and this is particularly marked among young car drivers.
The problem arises because insurance rates are based on the characteristics of the car owner and the number of accidents in recent years. The base rates for mature females are much lower than those for young people, and young males in particular, so it is much less expensive for a family to have a car owned by the mother of a young male than to have it owned by the young male.
True, after the young male using the car is involved in many accidents, the rates will rise, but then it seems to be a simple matter to change the owner to a grandmother, aunt or older sister.
What does “their car” mean in this context? Do the laws permit the government to demand that the owner, maybe a distant female relative, install ignition interlocks, because a young male was involved in an incident involving driving in an impaired condition, if the driver was a recidivist driving that car for the first time? Or even if the driver was the exclusive user of that car?
By contrast, in the US, insurance rates on any vehicle owned by a household are based on the person in the household with characteristics corresponding to the highest rating, so it is not easy to play the same games.
When my son reached 18 years of age and got a driver’s license, the insurance on the two cars in the household would have been more than double, except for the fact that he had moved to Canada for his university education and he was no longer a member of the household.
Moreover, in the US, there have been cases in which a grandmother who provided funds for a recidivist driver to purchase and insure a new car was required to pay damages for an accident incurred by the driver using the new car in an impaired condition because the court found that the grandmother had acted recklessly and endangered public safety in providing the financing, when she knew the history of recidivism.
Does Taiwan have such laws and are they being used?
Emilio Venezian
New Taipei City
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS