It is beginning to look like US President Donald Trump will yield to the Chinese in America’s trade conflict with China. The US threatened to increase tariffs on imports from China from to 25 percent from 10 percent today if no agreement was reached. However, Trump recently said that the date is flexible and might be postponed because of the progress being made in the ongoing bilateral talks.
Fair enough, but progress is in the eyes of the beholder. The most important problem that needs to be resolved is not America’s massive bilateral trade deficit with China. It is that the Chinese are stealing US firms’ technology and using it to help Chinese companies compete with those same firms in China and around the world.
The Chinese do this in two ways. First, US firms that want to do business in China are required to have a Chinese partner and to share their technology with that firm. That compulsory sharing of technology is explicitly forbidden by WTO rules. Since joining the WTO in 2001, the Chinese have ignored this rule and disingenuously claim that US firms voluntarily agree to share their technology because they want to be active in China.
INTERNET
Second, the Chinese use the Internet to enter the computer systems of US firms and steal technology and blueprints.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) agreed with then-US president Barack Obama in 2015 that his government would stop doing this. However, after a temporary decline, such cybertheft has resumed, presumably because state-owned companies and others have the ability to reach into the computer systems of US firms.
Despite Trump’s upbeat talk about progress in the talks, there is no suggestion that the Chinese will agree to stop stealing technology. Instead, Beijing’s chief negotiator, Chinese Vice Premier Liu He (劉鶴), has emphasized that the Chinese will reduce their large bilateral trade surplus by buying US soy beans and natural gas. A sharp reduction in the US trade deficit with China would enable Trump to claim victory and give him something to celebrate when Xi visits him at his home in Florida sometime in the next few months.
There are easy bragging rights in a dramatic reduction of the US trade deficit with China, which, year after year, has been the largest of America’s bilateral trade deficits. In 2017, the deficit with China was US$375 billion, or two-thirds of the total US trade deficit. So the Chinese are clever to offer to buy enough US commodities to cut that very visible imbalance.
GLOBAL TRADE
However, while that would reduce the bilateral trade deficit with China, it would have no effect by itself on the total US trade deficit. As every student of economics knows, a trade deficit reflects the fact that a country chooses to consume more than it produces. As long as a country consumes more than it produces, it must import the difference from the rest of the world.
If the Chinese do buy enough to reduce the bilateral trade deficit, the US would end up importing more from other countries or exporting less to other countries. The total US trade deficit will not decline unless the US reduces total demand by saving more. That is a matter for US policymakers; it is not something the Chinese can do for America.
US Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin has emphasized another largely irrelevant Chinese offer: a promise to prevent the value of the yuan from declining relative to the US dollar. While a stronger yuan would make Chinese goods less attractive to US buyers, thereby reducing the bilateral trade deficit, it would not reduce America’s global trade imbalance.
VARIATIONS
Moreover, although the yuan-greenback exchange rate varies from year to year, the variations have been small. Today, a US dollar buys 6.7 yuan; a year ago, the dollar exchange rate was 6.3 yuan and two years ago it was 6.9 yuan. A decade ago, in February 2009, a dollar bought 6.8 yuan. In short, there is nothing to celebrate if the Chinese agree to stabilize the value of their currency relative to the US dollar.
The key issue is technology theft. Unless the Chinese agree to stop stealing technology, and the two sides devise a way to enforce that agreement, the US will not have achieved anything useful from Trump’s tariffs.
Martin Feldstein, a professor of economics at Harvard University and president emeritus of the US National Bureau of Economic Research, chaired then-US president Ronald Reagan’s council of economic advisers from 1982 to 1984. In 2006, he was appointed to then-US president George W. Bush’s foreign intelligence advisory board and in 2009 was appointed to Obama’s economic recovery advisory board. He is on the board of directors of the US Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the Group of 30 non-profit.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS