Taiwan and China are two completely different political entities. At some time in the future, the two might be willing to hold negotiations aimed at resolving issues such as withdrawing China’s missiles aimed at Taiwan, promoting military exchanges, establishing a military buffer zone and reviewing the long-standing stalemate between the two sides. However, even if the will were there, none of these issues would be easy to resolve.
In other words, even if the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is voted back into government and wants to establish a system of military confidence-building measures or sign a cross-strait peace agreement with China, the biggest obstacle would still be China’s “one China” principle.
China’s leaders have often said that they are willing to accept the “1992 consensus” as a basis for economic, social and cultural exchanges with Taiwan, but they have never said that they could accept the “1992 consensus” as a basis for negotiating with Taiwan on highly sensitive political or military issues.
Looking back over the public statements made by Chinese leaders responsible for Taiwan affairs, they have never of their own initiative proposed the “1992 consensus” as a basis for resolving major cross-strait political disputes.
On the contrary, the Beijing government persists in its position of handling the question of Taiwan’s sovereignty in terms of “one country, two systems” and the “one China” principle. It has never made any concessions or allowed any leeway for compromise on this point.
Susan Shirk is chair of the 21st Century China Center at the University of California, San Diego and has been researching China for many years.
Shirk stated that successive generations of Chinese leaders have all stuck to a fixed position regarding the “Taiwan question,” because if any national leader dared to make concessions concerning Beijing’s “one China” principle, they would probably come under heavy attack from Chinese Communist Party comrades, the controlling alliance or the military, and be forced to step down.
During the eight years of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, frequent interactions took place between retired high-ranking military officers from either side of the Taiwan Strait.
However, when there was any suggestion of official, formal visits involving “cross-strait military exchanges,” no such visit ever went ahead. The fundamental reason was, and still is, that the Chinese authorities do not recognize the Republic of China and have never allowed any ambiguity or relaxation with respect to their “one China” principle.
Signing a “cross-strait peace agreement” would involve matters of Taiwan’s sovereignty and national dignity. It would depend on social consensus and the will of the public as a whole.
As such, it cannot be decided by any particular political party. This is all the more true given that China has never made the effort to express its goodwill. To float such a sensitive and controversial proposal under such conditions is not a wise move.
Yao Chung-yuan is a part-time university professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s Strategic Planning Department.
Translated by Julian Clegg
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times
RSS