Taiwanese artist Chen Cheng-po’s (陳澄波) Chiayi Street Scene, painted in 1934, depicts a tranquil scene in Japanese colonial era Taiwan, several years prior to the outbreak of World War II. Less than two years after Japan’s surrender in 1945, on March 25, 1947, Chen was dragged into the streets of Chiayi by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government troops and summarily executed.
Like thousands of other Taiwanese and Chinese, Chen had fallen victim to the violent suppression of civilians by the KMT on the orders of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), in an atrocity that is now known as the 228 Massacre.
Taiwanese have yet to find closure over the memory of the massacre or the Martial Law period and White Terror era that swiftly followed it.
On Friday last week, a group of university students vandalized a statue of Chiang on the National Chengchi University campus. On Sunday, more than 60 civic groups marched in Taipei to commemorate the anniversary of the 228 Incident. On Tuesday, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) rejected calls to demolish the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei.
Today is the 72nd anniversary of the Incident. It is a public holiday, officially known as 228 Peace Memorial Day. That name is not a reference to commemorating peace; it reflects the hope that peace can emerge from the memory of the massacre.
Peace and closure will only come from historical honesty, transparency and a rigorous and objective search for the facts of the nation’s shared past. In addition to remembrance of the victims, this day should be about all of these things, as well as the promotion of a sincere resolve to work toward transitional justice. Hopefully, these will enable understanding, and perhaps even forgiveness, for the perpetrators where it is sincerely sought.
Former KMT presidents have sought to atone for the Incident and the White Terror: Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) apologized for the Incident in 1995 and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) offered condolences on behalf of the then-KMT government to White Terror victims in 2013.
Those gestures did not go far enough. While the KMT does not consist of the same individuals directly responsible for overseeing the massacre or the White Terror, it does represent the state that perpetrated them. It still has to show its full sincerity in cooperating with the government’s transitional justice drive, including questions over its continued ownership of assets illicitly gained during the party-state era.
Chen’s art, through the tragedy of his death, could act as a powerful symbol of the pointless loss of life and of wasted potential as the result of the cruel actions of the ruthless KMT regime decades ago. In the same way, transparency and objective scrutiny of historical facts could transform former symbols of authoritarianism into lessons for the present so that the nation can move forward.
It could be argued that the anger of the students who vandalized Chiang’s statute is legitimate, but their actions were nevertheless still born of anger and of resorting to violence. That cannot be the right approach if the nation is to achieve peace and closure.
Statues of Chiang were originally erected nationwide to glorify the man. Times change and the social context in which they stand is now different. In that sense, keeping the statues in place has its own value.
The same is true for the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall. As English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Ozymandias so eloquently reminds its readers, the message of an edifice constructed to glorify a ruler does not necessarily survive a changed context.
The hall is a stately, somber building. It is perhaps perfect as a place to be repurposed into an educational space, in which Taiwan’s troubled history can be taught — objectively and in a nonpartisan way — to Taiwanese and those visiting the nation.
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement