South Korean President Moon Jae-in has staked his legacy on the stunning diplomatic progress he has forged with North Korea, as well as the behind-the-scenes orchestration of the US-North Korean summits.
However, following months of stalemate on North Korea nuclear talks, Moon’s presidency faces a crucial moment, with US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to meet for the second time tomorrow and on Thursday.
Moon, a liberal who took office in May 2017, is desperate for a breakthrough so he can continue engagement with the North that has driven the three-way diplomacy, but is now held back by tough US-led sanctions against Pyongyang. There is hope among Moon’s supporters that progress by Trump and Kim on the nuclear issue will allow the partial sanctions relief needed for the Koreas to resume joint economic projects that were shelved during previous standoffs.
However, Moon might be disappointed in his push for quick sanctions relief.
It remains unclear whether Kim is ready to deal away his nuclear arms and Washington still sees economic pressure as its best form of leverage over Pyongyang. If the nuclear negotiations break down, Moon could face a serious political dilemma over whether to continue to engage with the North or join another US-led pressure campaign.
Here is a look at the stakes for Moon as Trump and Kim prepare to meet in Vietnam’s capital, Hanoi:
Moon, who has preached that Seoul should be in the driver’s seat when dealing with Pyongyang, has prioritized improving bilateral relations with North Korea, which he says would help drive nuclear progress between Washington and Pyongyang.
A son of North Korean war refugees, Moon has vowed to build on the legacies of former South Korean presidents Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun. Under their “Sunshine policy,” which Moon had a hand in building as Roh’s chief of staff, economic inducements from Seoul resulted in temporary rapprochement and summits in 2000 and 2007 with then-North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, Kim Jong-un’s late father.
In a phone conversation with Trump on Tuesday, Moon said that the South was ready to proceed with inter-Korean economic projects to induce further nuclear disarmament steps from Kim Jong-un.
However, Moon is in a tougher spot than his liberal predecessors, who governed when the North’s nuclear threat was nascent. Kim Jong-un’s arsenal now includes purported thermonuclear warheads and intercontinental ballistic missiles potentially capable of reaching the US mainland.
The Trump-Kim meeting in Hanoi could be pivotal in determining whether things head toward a stable, nuclear-free Korean Peninsula, or the cementing of the North as a nuclear power. With crucial parliamentary elections coming next year, Moon cannot afford a major setback in inter-Korean relations, his strongest issue.
Moon continues to enjoy a good level of public support for his rapprochement with North Korea, but recent polls show that there is also growing skepticism among South Koreans, especially among older people, over whether Kim will ever give up his nuclear arms.
“As long as the Kim Jong-un regime is there, North Korea will never abandon its nuclear weapons, even if we pay them hundreds of billions of dollars or trillions of dollars,” said Thae Yong-ho, a former North Korean diplomat who defected to the South in 2016.
“The nuclear weapons are gravity that pulls the regime together,” Thae said. “They make up for the North getting behind in the inter-Korean competition and provide an instant solution to the North’s inferiority in conventional military power against the United States and South Korea.”
While Moon focuses mainly on North Korea, there is criticism that huge problems are being mishandled at home. There is discontent over a rapidly decaying job market — the 1.22 million South Koreans measured as jobless last month represented the highest number in 19 years. The bad economy has also compromised government efforts toward reforming powerful family-owned conglomerates often accused of monopolistic behavior and corruptive ties with politicians. There is also worry over the long-term effects of a falling birthrate as many women put off marriage and childbirth because of financial instability, grueling working hours and limited daycare services.
Deep gender, age and political divides seem to be coming to a head on the eve of an election year, and the ruling liberals have seen their popularity decline over scandals, including the arrest of a pro-Moon provincial governor for his involvement in manipulating online opinions ahead of the 2017 presidential election.
“Inter-Korean relations have been the only thing going well for the Moon government, but enthusiasm will quickly wane if we go through event after event without producing real changes on denuclearization,” said Yul Shin, a politics professor at Myongji University in Seoul.
The Koreas in recent months have taken military measures to reduce conventional threats, opened a liaison office in the North Korean border town of Kaesong and vowed to pursue a bid to co-host the 2032 Summer Olympics.
Now they want sanctions dialed back so they can resurrect two major symbols of rapprochement that provided much-needed hard currency to North Korea: a jointly run factory park in Kaesong and South Korean tours to the North’s scenic Diamond Mountain resort.
One potential deal could see Pyongyang agree to verifiably dismantle its main nuclear complex at Yongbyon and freeze its nuclear program. Washington, in return, could agree to take steps to free up inter-Korean activities at Kaesong and Diamond Mountain, said Koh Yu-hwan, a North Korea expert at Dongguk University in Seoul and one of Moon’s policy advisers.
However, Trump would need to go through an exhaustive process to soften US sanctions because of a 2016 law that demands significant progress not only on North Korea’s nuclear disarmament, but also on its human rights record for punitive measures to be suspended or removed.
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
To the dismay of the Chinese propaganda machine, President William Lai (賴清德) has been mounting an information offensive through his speeches. No longer are Taiwanese content with passively reacting to China’s encroachment in the international window of discourse, but Taiwan is now setting the tone and pace of conversation. Last month, Lai’s statement that “If China wants Taiwan it should also take back land from Russia” made international headlines, pointing out the duplicity of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) revanchism. History shows that the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) stance on regional territorial disputes has not been consistent. The early CCP
RSS