Hunkered down behind a wall of snow, two US Marines melt slush to make drinking water after spending the night digging out a defensive position high in the Sierra Nevada. Their laminated targeting map is wedged into the ice just below the machine gun.
Nearly 2,400m up at a training center in the California mountains, the air is thin, the snow is chest-high and the temperature is plunging.
However, other marines just a few kilometers away are preparing to attack, and forces on both sides must be able to battle the enemy and the unforgiving environment.
Illustration: Yusha
The exercise is designed to train troops for the next war — one the US believes will be against a more capable, high-tech enemy like Russia, North Korea or China. The weather conditions on the mountain mimic the kind of frigid fight that forces could face in one of those hotspots.
“We haven’t had to deal with these things. We’ve been very focused on Iraq and Afghanistan,” said US Major General William Mullen, head of the US Marine Corps Training and Education Command.
“What we really have to do is wake folks up, expose them to things that they haven’t had to think about for quite a while,” he said.
After 17 years of war against Taliban and al-Qaeda-linked insurgents, the US military is shifting its focus to better prepare for great-power competition with Russia and China, and against unpredictable foes such as North Korea and Iran.
US forces must be able to survive and fight while countering drones, sophisticated jamming equipment and other electronic and cyberwarfare that can track them, disrupt communications and kill them — technology they did not routinely face over the past decade.
“If you were to draw a line from here to the DMZ between North and South Korea, both of these sites are on the 38th parallel. And so the weather here accurately replicates the weather that we would encounter in North and South Korea,” said US Colonel Kevin Hutchison, the training center commander, referring to the demilitarized zone. “What you’re seeing here is marines fighting marines, so we are replicating a near-peer threat.”
As a snowstorm swirls around them, Mullen and Hutchison move through the woods, checking in with the young marines designated as the adversary force of about 250 troops who must prevent more than 800 attackers from gaining control of nearby Wolf Creek Bridge.
An Associated Press team was allowed to accompany them to the US Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center south of Lake Tahoe and watch the training.
Lance Corporal Reese Nichols, from Pensacola, Florida, and Lance Corporal Chase Soltis of Bozeman, Montana, dug their defensive position a day ago, and they have been watching all night for enemy movement, while using a small burner to melt snow to stay hydrated.
The hardest part is “boiling water 24/7. And the cold. It’s cold,” Nichols said.
The cold and wet conditions force the marines to use snowshoes and cross-country skis to get around. They wrap white camouflage around their weapons, struggle to keep the ammunition dry and learn how to position their machine guns so they do not sink into the powdery snow.
“It’s kind of overwhelming coming up here. Many of them have never been exposed to snow before,” said Staff Sergeant Rian Lusk, chief instructor for the mountain sniper course. “You’re constantly having to dig or move up the mountain range. So, it’s physically taxing, but more than anything, I think, it’s mentally taxing.”
The US Marine Corps has changed its training in the mountain course and at Twentynine Palms Marine base 640km south. Instead of scripted exercises, trainers map out general objectives and let the marines make their own battle decisions, replicating a more unpredictable combat situation.
Rather than fighting from forward operating bases that stretched across Iraq and Afghanistan, complete with security forces and chow halls, troops now have to be more independent, commanders said, providing their own protection and support.
They must prepare for a more formidable, high-tech enemy.
Mullen recalled speaking to a commander in Ukraine in the aftermath of Russia’s annexation of Crimea.
“He said that within two minutes of keying his handset he had rockets coming in on his position,” said Mullen, who spent two days at Twentynine Palms, watching a battlefield exercise, before flying to the Bridgeport base in California’s Toiyabe National Forest.
The key in both places is whether the marines can stay undetected and adjust their battle plan quickly when faced with unexpected threats, Mullen said.
Back on the mountain, Mullen and Hutchison have seized on that issue. The attacking force, members of 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment out of Camp Pendleton, California, spotted one of the adversary’s fighting positions and fired on it. The simulated attack did not hurt anyone, but the competition is real for the defending forces from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, out of Twentynine Palms.
“You took casualties today and you didn’t respond to it,” Hutchison told the platoon leader, 2nd Lieutenant Brendan Dixon of Hampton Roads, Virginia.
Why did Dixon not move his marines to a safer location, Mullen asked.
In the face of questioning from senior leaders, Dixon held his ground, confident that his forces were in the right place to defend the bridge.
It turns out, he was right.
Moving toward the bridge, the attacking forces became trapped on a ridgeline, exposed to the enemy and unable to move through a ravine filled with snow. Gunfire exploded across the ridge.
The final assessment by the trainers was that the attackers suffered 30 to 40 percent casualties, while Dixon’s troops lost about 10 percent.
The attacking force made some decisions that would have resulted in marine deaths in a real battle, but it is better to learn now than in combat, Hutchison said.
“In the Far East, whether it’s in northern Europe, etc, we’re replicating that here. And what we’re finding is, it’s an extremely challenging problem,” Hutchison said. “And it’s a problem that, frankly, if we don’t train to, it’s going to cost a lot of marine lives.”
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —