The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics earlier this month forecast that US-China trade tensions could weigh on exports this year, slowing economic growth to 2.27 percent, from 2.6 percent last year. However, more than the trade dispute, a faster cooling of China’s economy might hurt Taiwan to a greater extent than its regional neighbors, which is pushing the government to step up construction of public infrastructure, boost domestic consumption and encourage private investment.
Private investment — and the repatriation of capital by Taiwanese companies — could increase if investment barriers such as land, labor and electricity shortages were removed.
Since last year, Taiwanese businesses have increasingly opted to repatriate earnings from overseas operations due to stringent business conditions in China, and because they want to circumvent the high taxes in many countries following the implementation of the Common Reporting Standard — a framework for the global exchange of tax data.
Private investment could expand 4.31 percent this year, after growing 3.17 percent last year, if the government worked to eliminate barriers and facilitate capital repatriation, according to an Academia Sinica projection from December last year.
Capital repatriation would boost weak domestic demand more effectively than relying on the formalization of free-trade agreements with other countries, and a bill to regulate the repatriation of offshore capital is reportedly a priority in this legislative session.
At a Cabinet meeting last week, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) was briefed about the planned tax benefits for companies and individuals who repatriate money, as well as the investment categories allowing for tax breaks or exemptions, local media reported. The Executive Yuan is to present the special bill to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) when it is finalized, the reports said.
Meanwhile, legal interpretations issued by the Ministry of Finance at the end of last month and remarks made by ministry officials have sought to clarify businesses’ questions about capital repatriation, especially what types of foreign-sourced income they must pay taxes on and whether they might become tax targets.
The government is eyeing how to repatriate capital to revitalize the economy, while businesses are eyeing what tax incentives might be up for grabs.
Further justifying the need for the bill is that, in the final quarter of last year, the nation’s financial account — both direct and portfolio investments — saw a net asset increase of US$17.88 billion. This was the 34th consecutive quarter of capital outflows, bringing aggregate net outflows to US$413.31 billion as of Dec. 31 last year.
One thing is for sure: The government should use a carrot-and-stick approach to regulate repatriated funds. The funds must be placed in special accounts regulated by the government at financial institutions and they need to be directed into specific industries, preventing them from flowing into the real-estate market or financing criminal activities. Controlling money laundering must continue to be a priority for the government in regulating the funds.
However, the funds could enjoy a tax break or exemption in investment categories such as the government’s “five plus two” innovative industries plan or the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program.
Certainly, the proposed bill and tax breaks present advantages and disadvantages, and the fairness of any tax breaks remains a concern for those who repatriated funds earlier and those who have always held their funds locally.
However, the bill does present a win-win opportunity for the government, for Taiwanese businesses and for the economy as a whole if the fund inflows can be well-regulated, and used effectively to facilitate innovation and transformation from the perspective of long-term national development.
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
RSS