In an open letter published on the Brookings Institution Web site on Feb. 11, former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Richard Bush made some critical remarks about the Formosa Alliance’s proposal to hold a referendum on independence for Taiwan.
His remarks have dragged many people who are impatient to see an independent Taiwan back to the reality of international politics.
The “proposal touches on the national interests of the United States, specifically its abiding interest in peace and security in the Taiwan area and its longstanding view that neither side of the Taiwan Strait should try unilaterally to change the ‘status quo,’” Bush wrote.
“If China were to use ‘non-peaceful means’ in response to … secession by Taiwan” and “if the men and women of the US armed forces are to risk their lives for the safety of Taiwan, American leaders would want to be certain that such a sacrifice was clearly necessary in light of US interests,” because “the … commitment of the United States to come to Taiwan’s defense … has never been absolute,” he wrote.
This raises a number of important points.
First, as long as Taiwan is not strong enough to seek independence on its own, or even to defend itself, it must think about what the US has really promised with respect to protecting it.
It is true that the alliance’s campaign for an independence referendum gives voice to the heartfelt aspirations of independence supporters. However, the timing is very important.
At this stage, China, not Taiwan, is the side that really wants to alter the “status quo.”
Whenever China does “try unilaterally to change the ‘status quo,’” the US naturally responds.
For the past three years, whenever China has put pressure on Taiwan, the US’ policy of defending Taiwan comes into play, and that this works to Taiwan’s benefit?
As for the alliance’s activities, they have taken what was originally a favorable situation for Taiwanese and turned it around to the advantage of China and supporters of unification.
Second, as long as Taiwan does not “try unilaterally to change the ‘status quo,’” the US government is justified in sending its troops to protect Taiwan.
If that is so, Taiwanese need not listen to warnings from China and pro-unification media that if Beijing’s wishes are not complied with, China will attack Taiwan. That is an empty threat.
To take it a step further, if Taiwanese elect a head of state who the US can trust to stick to their principles and not alter the “status quo,” then Taiwan can maintain the “status quo” in theory while already being an independent country in practice.
Why then would Taiwanese voters choose a president who leans toward unification, or one selected by China?
The most important question for safeguarding Taiwan’s security, and maintaining its economic development and its citizens’ practical independence, is how to choose a president who the US can trust to maintain the “status quo” and uphold Taiwan’s interests.
Lin Shiou-jeng is chair of Chung Chou University of Science and Technolog’s marketing and logistics management department.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS