In general this year, global equity markets have moved upward, despite a spate of poor economic and trade data, disappointing corporate earnings, lingering US-China trade tensions and heightened uncertainty over Brexit. Market sentiment seems out of step with the real world, casting doubt on bullish investors and any conviction that the outlook will last.
In part, the trend has been upheld by market expectations that the world’s two largest economies will soon resolve their trade spat, but the cautious monetary policies of the major central banks, amid a sharp slowdown in manufacturing activity and sluggish GDP growth, have also been lending support to equities.
The US Federal Reserve’s monetary policy in the past few weeks has become more dovish than several months ago, as the 35-day partial government shutdown — the longest in US history — hit consumer confidence. Signs of a cooling economy and benign inflationary pressure are likely to pressure the Fed to hold interest rates steady.
Germany just avoided a technical recession after reporting zero GDP growth in the final quarter of last year, after a 0.2 percent decrease in the previous quarter, while the European Central Bank (ECB) has warned of rising downside risk to the euro-area outlook. As the European Commission has cut forecasts for economic growth in the eurozone for this year and next, the ECB’s interest rates are likely to remain low.
To boost a slowing economy, India’s central bank on Feb. 7 unexpectedly cut interest rates and shifted its stance to “neutral,” while the Reserve Bank of Australia has adopted a dovish stance amid China concerns and housing market uncertainty.
Japan last week reported that economic growth there returned to positive territory in the last quarter, but the nation’s growth momentum remains weak due to the effects of softening external demand. To keep credit flowing and fight deflation, the Bank of Japan is likely to continue an accommodative monetary policy.
Not having hiked policy rates since September 2016, Taiwan’s central bank is maintaining a dovish stance toward monetary policy. Minutes of the bank’s December meeting showed that board members saw no reason to raise rates when softer global demand is dragging down external trade.
Confirming the central bank’s stance, last week’s export data showed that total outbound shipments declined 0.3 percent annually for a third consecutive month, while the government’s statistics agency and some private think tanks revised GDP growth forecasts for this year downward.
Central banks worldwide are following the Fed in reining in plans to tighten monetary policy, and some governments have launched incentive-based measures to boost private consumption, but increased domestic investment, in the form of private investments or public infrastructure projects, is needed to help arrest potential slowdowns in employment and wage growth.
So far, in an effort to avoid being battered by the trade war, nine Taiwanese companies operating overseas have gained the government’s green light to take part in a Ministry of Economic Affairs program to invest at home, which could create 3,700 jobs — a NT$25.6 billion (US$829.82 million) investment.
However, that is unlikely to be enough. The government must expand infrastructure spending, provide relief measures for small and medium-sized businesses and assist local companies in marketing products overseas.
After all, the government must remember that stable policies matter most to investing businesses, but stability requires consistency and predictability, whether the central bank is dovish or hawkish.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,