South Koreans, always deeply divided over how to best deal with their often belligerent northern neighbor, are reacting with both hope and wariness to US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he will hold a second nuclear disarmament summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.
However, for liberal South Korean President Moon Jae-in, who is eager to push ahead with ambitious plans for engagement with North Korea, a breakthrough in Vietnam is crucial.
Moon served as diplomatic intermediary between the US and North Korea following the North’s increasingly powerful string of weapons tests and Trump’s threats of military action in 2017.
A year of mostly fruitless diplomacy has led to serious doubts about Kim’s sincerity and Trump’s ability to force North Korea to significantly reduce the threat its nuclear weapons pose to the region and world.
“Denuclearization will be difficult, because North Korea wants to keep nuclear weapons, and the United States wants them all gone,” Lee Sang-won, a 68-year-old retiree, said on Thursday at a bustling Seoul train station.
Trump announced the Feb. 27-28 summit during his State of the Union address last week, as millions of South Koreans visited their hometowns during the Lunar New Year holiday.
On Thursday last week, Trump’s special envoy for North Korea, Stephen Biegun, held a second day of talks with officials in Pyongyang to hammer out summit logistics and an agenda.
Biegun on Friday went to to South Korea to brief officials there.
Moon’s office on Wednesday said that Seoul hopes that Trump and Kim will make “concrete and substantial progress” in their talks in Vietnam, but few other details were released.
At Seoul Station, broadcasts of Trump’s summit announcement drew crowds in front of large TV screens. Trump, Kim and nuclear weapons were also likely subjects of heated political discussions at holiday dinner tables across the country.
A wave of optimism greeted the diplomatic developments of last year, which included three summits between Kim and Moon as well as the first Trump-Kim summit in Singapore, but South Koreans might have become much more skeptical in the past few months.
In a poll of about 1,000 people conducted by Gallup Korea in December last year, 45 percent of respondents said they do not believe Kim will keep his denuclearization promises, compared with 38 percent who said they trust Kim. The margin of error was 3.1 percentage points.
Despite the hype of Trump’s first meeting with Kim, the highly orchestrated one-day meeting in Singapore only produced a vague aspirational vow about a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula without describing when and how it would occur.
North Korea has since insisted that US-led sanctions against the country should be lifted before there is any progress in nuclear negotiations, and Kim has yet to convincingly show that he will voluntarily relinquish an arsenal he might see as his strongest guarantee of survival.
Moon is trying to keep Washington hardliners at bay and create more space for inter-Korean reconciliation, which he has said is crucial for resolving the nuclear standoff.
The Koreas in past months have discussed reconnecting railways and roads across their border, resuming operations at a jointly run factory park in the North Korean border town of Kaesong and restarting South Korean tours to the North’s Diamond Mountain resort.
However, tough sanctions have limited what they can do, with Washington insisting on keeping up economic pressure until North Korea takes stronger steps toward irreversibly and verifiably relinquishing its nuclear weapons.
Some in South Korea hope that Kim will be ready to make meaningful concessions in Vietnam that Trump could then respond to by partially easing the sanctions on the North to allow more inter-Korean cooperation.
One potential deal could see North Korea agreeing to dismantle key parts of its Nyongbyon nuclear complex, freeze its nuclear program and allow in inspectors in exchange for the US granting sanctions exemptions for inter-Korean activities at Kaesong and Diamond Mountain, said Koh Yu-hwan, a North Korea expert at Seoul’s Dongguk University.
Ahead of his visit to the Koreas, Bigeun early this month said that Kim had committed to “the dismantlement and destruction of North Korea’s plutonium and uranium enrichment facilities” during a September last year summit with Moon and at a meeting with the US secretary of state in October.
“In Singapore, Trump and Kim were chased by time and they couldn’t even get to the main subject,” said Koh, who is also a policy adviser to Moon. “This time they will at least have to agree on what the early steps of the denuclearization process would be. They can’t let another summit be called a failure.”
Shin Beomchul, a senior analyst at Seoul’s Asan Institute for Policy Studies, said a key point of the summit would be whether North Korea agrees to accept inspectors to verify its activities to dismantle its nuclear facilities.
“If both sides agree on the declaration, verification and dismantling of the Nyongbyon nuclear facility, we can say that it was a successful summit,” Shin said.
There is also speculation about a possible four-way meeting, also including Moon and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), to declare a formal end to the Korean War, which stopped with an armistice and left the peninsula still technically at war.
However, Washington has insisted that North Korea needs to first take more concrete steps toward denuclearization.
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
RSS