Three Taiwanese have been hailed this month by international publications for their growing influence on the world, a timely reminder of the potent value of soft power to this nation.
Newsweek last week named Portico Media founder Jay Lin (林志杰) as one of the 15 members of its “Creative Class of 2019,” while Foreign Policy magazine on Wednesday named Minister Without Portfolio Audrey Tang (唐鳳) and venture capitalist Lee Kai-fu (李開復) as two of its “Top 100 Global Thinkers.”
While Lin and Tang both spent time working in California’s Silicon Valley before returning to Taiwan and are prominent LGBT activists, they share another trait: They are outspoken proponents of digital technology as a catalyst for transformation, be it the entertainment media industry or government.
Lin, an intellectual property lawyer-turned media mogul and movie producer, was cited by Newsweek for his LGBT rights work: In addition to founding the Taiwan International Queer Film Festival in 2014, the Queermosa film awards in 2016 and the GagaOOLala streaming platform in 2017, he has been active in the effort to get a same-sex marriage law passed.
The magazine said that for its list, it selected people who have “developed creative solutions to problems that face our world … and leveraged heightened globalization, increased awareness and cutting-edge technology to make their dreams come true.”
That is certainly true for Lin in another aspect that was not mentioned by the magazine: helping break down societal barriers and prejudices in Taiwan as a gay man who, with his partner, are proud parents to twin sons born to a surrogate mother in the US.
Tang, an entrepreneur turned government official who was a readers’ poll choice for the Foreign Policy list, in October 2016 became not only the nation’s youngest-ever government minister at 36, but its first transgender one and the only one to proudly proclaim her anarchist beliefs.
Charged with propelling Taiwan’s high-tech sector, Tang is also pushing for the free exchange of resources across industries and within the government, part of her belief in the power of open-source communications to build channels in this nation and globally.
Tang likes to talk about “warm” power — promoting the UN’s sustainable development goals digitally — rather than soft power, but she has also said that technology-assisted open governance is Taiwan’s warm power, as well as a way to retool the nation’s sharing economy.
Lee, a computer scientist known for his work on speech recognition and artificial intelligence who worked for three of the biggest names in tech before turning to investment, is a big believer in soft power, especially for Taiwan.
Although he has long lived as an expatriate, Lee, in a June 2017 speech at a National Taiwan University graduation ceremony, said that Taiwan should focus on turning its soft power in the service, cultural and creative industries into a competitive advantage.
Soft power is an intangible asset for Taiwan that the past few governments have frequently talked about, but often failed to promote in terms of financing, infrastructure or breadth of vision.
Tang, Lin and Lee are proof that Taiwanese can make a difference internationally in the technological, cultural and creative spheres.
Their achievements as entrepreneurs and thinkers — and in Tang’s case, in officialdom — are deserving of accolades, but it is also their willingness to challenge the established order and explore innovative and creative solutions to problems that they see that should be celebrated and emulated.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged