A Scottish perspective
In April 2017, I went to Scotland for my honeymoon. While paying for some purchases at a Superdry clothing store in Edinburgh, I handed my Republic of China passport to a male shop assistant to obtain a duty free receipt.
He asked me: “Are you Taiwanese?” After I said yes, the assistant, who said he was from Glasgow, proceeded to provide a self-assured analysis of cross-strait relations:
“Taiwan and China are not the same country. Although China claims Taiwan as part of its sovereign territory, Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation,” he said.
Just like the relationship between Scotland and the rest of the UK, in his eyes, Scotland and the UK are not the same country.
He said: “Although England says that Scotland is a part of the UK, eventually Scotland will become a genuinely independent country through another independence referendum. China wants to trap Taiwan in a straitjacket by using the “one China” principle — come on, give me a break.”
After I finished listening, I could not help but gasp in admiration at this young Scottish man’s understanding of the cross-strait relationship. Not only did he understand that Taiwan is its own country, he also knew that Taiwanese must grudgingly submit to China’s “one China” principle framework.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has clearly misunderstood the voting intentions of the Taiwanese public in the Nov. 24 local elections. It was a repudiation of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) and the Cabinet’s performance in government to date, not an endorsement of the so-called “1992 consensus” — even less so an acknowledgment of “one China” (which abroad is universally recognized to mean the People’s Republic of China).
Beijing needs to understand that voters in the local elections were registering their concerns about the economy, not voting on cross-strait politics.
All Taiwanese recognize two things: first, the virtue of democratic government and, second, that Taiwan is not the same country as China. Xi should give up trying to peddle the “one China” principle to Taiwan. After all, it has been tried in Hong Kong with “one country, two systems” — and has been an unmitigated failure.
The Tsai administration would do well to study the 2014 Scottish independence referendum held under then-British prime minister David Cameron.
Shih Yu-hsuan
Changhua County
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS