New policies by the administration of US President Donald Trump aimed at curbing China’s access to US innovation have all but halted Chinese investment in US technology start-ups as investors and founders abandon deals amid scrutiny from Washington.
Chinese venture funding in US start-ups crested to a record US$3 billion last year, according to New York economic research firm Rhodium Group, spurred by a rush of investors and tech companies scrambling to complete deals before a new regulatory regime was approved in August.
Since then, Chinese venture funding in US start-ups has slowed to a trickle, interviews with more than 35 industry players show.
Trump signed new legislation expanding the US government’s ability to block foreign investment in US companies, regardless of the investor’s country of origin. However, Trump has been particularly vocal about stopping China from getting its hands on strategic US technologies.
The new rules are still being finalized, but tech industry veterans said the fallout has been swift.
“Deals involving Chinese companies and Chinese buyers and Chinese investors have virtually stopped,” said attorney Nell O’Donnell, who has represented US tech companies in transactions with foreign buyers.
Lawyers who spoke to reporters say they are feverishly rewriting deal terms to help ensure investments get the stamp of approval from Washington. Chinese investors, including big family offices, have walked away from transactions and stopped taking meetings with US start-ups. Some entrepreneurs, meanwhile, are eschewing Chinese money, fearful of lengthy government reviews that could sap their resources and momentum in an arena where speed to market is critical.
Volley Labs Inc, a San Francisco-based company that uses artificial intelligence to build corporate training materials, is playing it safe. It declined offers from Chinese investors last year after accepting cash from Beijing-based TAL Education Group as part of a financing round in 2017.
“We decided for optical reasons it just wouldn’t make sense to expose ourselves further to investors coming from a country where there is now so much by way of trade tensions and IP tensions,” Volley chief executive officer Carson Kahn said.
A Silicon Valley venture capitalist told reporters that he is aware of at least 10 deals, some involving companies in his own portfolio, that fell apart because they would need approval from the interagency group known as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (CFIUS).
He declined to be named for fear of bringing negative attention to his portfolio companies.
CFIUS is the government group tasked with reviewing foreign investment for potential national security and competitive risks. The new legislation expands its powers. Among them: the ability to probe transactions previously excluded from its purview, including attempts by foreigners to purchase minority stakes in US start-ups.
China is in the crosshairs. The Asian giant has been an aggressive investor in technology deemed critical to its global competitiveness and military prowess. Chinese investors have bought stakes in ride-hailing firms Uber Technologies Inc and Lyft, as well as companies with more sensitive technologies, including data center networking firm Barefoot Networks, autonomous driving startup Zoox and speech recognition start-up AISense.
A dearth of Chinese money is unlikely to spell doomsday for Silicon Valley. Investors worldwide poured more than US$84 billion into US start-ups in the first three quarters of last year, exceeding any prior full-year funding, according to data provider PitchBook Inc.
Still, Chinese funders are critical to helping US companies gain access to the world’s second-largest economy.
Kahn acknowledged that rejecting Chinese investment might make his start-up’s overseas expansion more difficult.
“Those of us who are operators and entrepreneurs feel the brunt of these tensions,” he said.
It is a radical shift for Silicon Valley. Money has historically flowed in from every corner of the globe, including from geopolitical rivals such as China and Russia, largely uninhibited by US government scrutiny or regulation.
Reid Whitten, an attorney with Sheppard Mullin, said that of the six companies he recently advised to get CFIUS approval for their investment offers, only two have opted to file the paperwork. The others abandoned their deals or are still considering whether to proceed.
“It is a generational change in the way we look at foreign investment in the United States,” Whitten said.
The decline in Chinese investment comes amid heightened tensions between Beijing and Washington. Trump has blasted China for its enormous trade surplus and for what he claims are its underhanded strategies to obtain leading-edge American technology.
The nations have already levied billions in tariffs on each other’s goods. Trump is considering an executive order to bar US companies from using telecommunications equipment made by China’s Huawei and ZTE, which the US government has accused of spying.
CFIUS is emerging as another powerful cudgel. Led by the US Department of the Treasury, it includes members from eight other government entities, including the departments of defense, state and homeland security. The secretive committee does not disclose much about the deals it reviews, but its most recent annual report said that Chinese investors made 74 CFIUS filings from 2013 to 2015, the most of any nation.
The president has the authority to make the final decision, but a thumbs-down from CFIUS is usually enough to doom a deal.
Washington demonstrated its tougher stance even before the new law was passed, when Trump in March blocked a US$117 billion hostile bid by Singapore-based Broadcom Ltd to acquire Qualcomm Inc of San Diego.
CFIUS said that the takeover would hamper the US in the race to develop the next generation of wireless technology.
A White House spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.
In November, CFIUS rolled out a pilot program mandating that foreign investors notify the committee of any size investment in certain “critical technologies.”
The scope of that term is still being defined, but a working list includes artificial intelligence, logistics technology, robotics and data analytics — the bread and butter of Silicon Valley.
Research firm Rhodium predicted that up to three-quarters of Chinese venture investments would be subject to CFIUS review under the new rules.
Just the threat of scrutiny has caused some Chinese investors to reconsider.
Peter Kuo, whose firm, Silicon Valley Global, connects Chinese investors with US start-ups, said his business has slumped dramatically.
Last year, not a single Chinese investor took a stake in the companies he shopped to them, he said.
“CFIUS didn’t kill our organization, but it hampered a lot of start-ups, and most of them are American start-ups,” Kuo said.
Some security experts applaud what they call long-overdue protections for US start-ups.
“What we are concerned about is a limited number of bad actors who are phenomenally clever about how they can access our intellectual property,” said Bob Ackerman, founder of AllegisCyber, a venture capital firm based in San Francisco and Maryland that backs cybersecurity start-ups.
Rhodium calculates that, on average, 21 percent of Chinese venture investment in the US from 2000 through 2017 came from state-owned funds, which are controlled at least in part by the Chinese government. Last year, that figure surged to 41 percent.
However, some tech industry players say Washington is casting too wide a net in its zeal to check Beijing.
“A lot of innocent business people are getting” caught up in the administration’s spat with China, said Wei Guo, the China-born founding partner of Silicon Valley firm UpHonest Capital.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more