US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez began her term as the youngest woman ever elected to the US Congress with a bang this week by proposing to tax the ultra-rich at 60 or 70 percent.
The daughter of hardscrabble working-class parents, the 29-year-old New Yorker was working toward making good on a campaign promise.
“People are going to have to pay their fair share of taxes,” she told CBS television’s 60 Minutes on Sunday.
The proposal is part of an ambitious tax plan dubbed the Green New Deal, which aims to eliminate carbon emissions by 2030.
The self-described Democratic Socialist, nicknamed AOC, suggested taxing the ultra-wealthy up to 70 percent to finance the plan.
“You look at our tax rates back in the 60s, and when you have a progressive tax rate system, your tax rate, let’s say, from zero to US$75,000 may be 10 percent or 15 percent, et cetera, but once you get to, like, the tippy tops, on your 10 millionth dollar, sometimes you see tax rates as high as 60 or 70 percent,” Ocasio-Cortez said.
“That doesn’t mean all US$10 million are taxed at an extremely high rate, but it means that as you climb up this ladder you should be contributing more,” she said.
The top marginal tax rate is now 37 percent, following US President Donald Trump’s fiscal reforms. It was previously 39.6 percent.
Even though it has little chance of success, the proposal backed by the young lawmaker has already garnered significant support.
It landed her on the front page of the New York Daily News, an image of which Ocasio-Cortez was quick to retweet.
A Washington Post analysis found that if the approximately 16,000 Americans who earn more than US$10 million each paid 70 percent income taxes for any revenue above that marker, the federal government would rake in about US$72 billion per year.
However, the sum would likely be much lower, because individuals falling in that bracket would find ways to avoid the heavy tax burden.
In a New York Times op-ed, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman backed Ocasio-Cortez, rejecting “the constant effort to portray her as flaky and ignorant.”
“On the tax issue, she’s just saying what good economists say,” he said.
Ocasio-Cortez’s surprise victory during Democratic primaries in June over Joseph Crowley has made her a key figure of the liberal wing of the party. Crowley had run unopposed for more than a decade and was seen as a contender to become the next speaker of the US House of Representatives.
Ocasio-Cortez rarely attacks US President Donald Trump — but when questioned, she told CBS there was “no question” that he was a racist.
“The president certainly didn’t invent racism, but he’s certainly given a voice to it and expanded it, and created a platform for those things,” she said.
In response, the White House told CBS that Trump has “repeatedly condemned racism and bigotry in all forms,” dismissing Ocasio-Cortez’s “sheer ignorance.”
However, the 29-year-old is no stranger to criticism — and has repeatedly demonstrated that she can respond swiftly to her detractors.
To suggestions that her proposals are unrealistic, she told CBS: “We pay more per capita in healthcare and education for lower outcomes than many other nations, and so for me, what’s unrealistic is what we’re living in right now.”
When Republican campaign consultant Ed Rollins called her a “little girl” on a conservative television talk show, Ocasio-Cortez shot back on Twitter: “If anything, this dude is a walking argument to tax misogyny at 100%.”
On Friday last week, a video released online by a detractor showed a young Ocasio-Cortez dancing with fellow Boston University students to the Phoenix song Lisztomania in a remake of a mash-up of scenes from the Brat Pack movies.
However, rather than embarrass Ocasio-Cortez, the release ended up having the opposite of its intended effect.
The representative, who has more than 2 million Twitter followers and 1.5 million on Instagram, responded by posting a new video of her dancing in front of her office on Capitol Hill, writing: “I hear the GOP thinks women dancing are scandalous. Wait till they find out Congresswomen dance too!”
With her past as a New York bartender, Ocasio-Cortez is a figurehead of the new wave of young lawmakers who entered Congress after the midterm elections, bringing fresh perspectives and more diversity to the legislature.
Asked if she considers herself to be a radical, Ocasio-Cortez told CBS: “You know, if that’s what radical means, call me a radical.”
“I think that it only has ever been radicals that have changed this country,” she said. “Abraham Lincoln made the radical decision to sign the Emancipation Proclamation. Franklin Delano Roosevelt made the radical decision to embark on establishing programs like Social Security. That is radical.”
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS