It is old news that large segments of society have become deeply unhappy with what they see as “the establishment,” especially the political class. The “yellow vest” protests in France, triggered by French President Emmanuel Macron’s move to hike fuel taxes in the name of combating climate change, are just the latest example of the scale of this alienation.
There are good reasons for today’s disgruntlement: Four decades of promises by political leaders of the center-left and center-right, espousing the neoliberal faith that globalization, financialization, deregulation, privatization and a host of related reforms would bring unprecedented prosperity, have gone unfulfilled.
While a tiny elite seems to have done very well, large swaths of the population have fallen out of the middle class and plunged into a new world of vulnerability and insecurity. Even leaders in countries with low, but increasing inequality have felt their public’s wrath.
Illustration: Mountain People
By the numbers, France looks better than most, but it is perceptions, not numbers, that matter; even in France, which avoided some of the extremism of the era of former US president Ronald Reagan and former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher, things are not going well for many.
When taxes on the very wealthy are lowered, but raised for ordinary citizens to meet budgetary demands — whether from far-off Brussels or from well-off financiers — it should come as no surprise that some are angry.
The yellow vests’ refrain speaks to their concerns: “The government talks about the end of the world. We are worried about the end of the month.”
In short, there is a gross mistrust in governments and politicians, which means that asking for sacrifices today in exchange for the promise of a better life tomorrow is unlikely to pass muster. This is especially true of “trickle down” policies: tax cuts for the rich that eventually are supposed to benefit everyone else.
When I was at the World Bank, the first lesson in policy reform was that sequencing and pacing matter. The promise of the Green New Deal that is now being championed by progressives in the US has both of these elements right.
The Green New Deal is premised on three observations.
First, there are unutilized and underutilized resources — especially human talent — that can be used effectively.
Second, if there were more demand for those with low and medium skills, their wages and standards of living would rise.
Third, a good environment is an essential part of human well-being, today and in the future.
If the challenges of climate change are not met today, huge burdens will be imposed on the next generation.
It is just wrong for this generation to pass these costs on to the next. It is better to leave a legacy of financial debts, which future generations can somehow manage, than to hand down a possibly unmanageable environmental disaster.
Almost 90 years ago, then-US president Franklin D. Roosevelt responded to the Great Depression with his New Deal, a bold package of reforms that touched almost every aspect of the US economy.
However, it is more than the symbolism of the New Deal that is being invoked now. It is its animating purpose: putting people back to work, in the way that Roosevelt did for the US, with its crushing unemployment of the time. Back then, that meant investments in rural electrification, roads and dams.
Economists have debated how effective the New Deal was — its spending was probably too low and not sustained enough to generate the kind of recovery the economy needed. Nonetheless, it left a lasting legacy by transforming the country at a crucial time.
So, too, for a Green New Deal: It could provide public transportation, linking people with jobs, and retrofit the economy to meet the challenge of climate change. At the same time, these investments themselves would create jobs.
It has long been recognized that decarbonization, if done correctly, would be a great job creator, as the economy prepares itself for a world with renewable energy.
Of course, some jobs — for example, those of the 53,000 coal miners in the US — would be lost, and programs are needed to retrain such workers for other jobs, but to return to the refrain, sequencing and pacing matter.
It would make more sense to begin with creating new jobs before the old jobs are destroyed, to ensure that the profits of the oil and coal companies are taxed and the hidden subsidies they receive eliminated, before asking those who are barely getting by to pony up more.
The Green New Deal sends a positive message of what government can do, for this generation of citizens and the next.
It could deliver today what those who are suffering today need most — good jobs. It could also deliver the protections from climate change that are needed for the future.
The Green New Deal would have to be broadened, and this is especially true in countries such as the US, where many ordinary citizens lack access to good education, adequate healthcare or decent housing.
The grassroots movement behind the Green New Deal offers a ray of hope to the badly battered establishment: They should embrace it, flesh it out, and make it part of the progressive agenda.
Something positive is needed to save us from the ugly wave of populism, nativism and protofascism that is sweeping the world.
Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, is a professor at Columbia University and chief economist at the Roosevelt Institute. His most recent book is Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited: Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a