A suggestion for Xi
I have a suggestion for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that may help him cope with his disappointment with Taiwan’s lack of interest in his unification proposals.
He should consult with the UN for the staging of a UN-organized referendum of the Chinese people as to whether they would prefer to be governed by the unelected Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or by a democratically elected government in a multiparty system. There is little doubt what the result would be.
The result would also indicate why the people of democratic Taiwan want nothing to do with the CCP and its thuggery.
Which brings me to the point of legitimacy. One of the historic hallmarks of a legitimate government is that it governs with the consent of the governed. At some stage the governed must have demonstrated their willingness to accept the governing entity as the entity charged with making laws for the benefit of the governed.
The CCP, as the government of China, has not at any stage possessed any of the accepted hallmarks of legitimacy. The nations of the world should recognize this reality in dealings with the regime.
The CCP may rule China by force, but as a “government,” it is totally illegitimate.
Gavan Duffy
Queensland, Australia
Millions of virtuous Chinese
In his well-known poem, chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東) wrote: “Spring breeze sways tens of thousands of willow branches in the holy land of China. This great land is brimming with 600 million virtuous people [春風楊柳萬千條, 六億神州盡舜堯].” So impressive is the poem that many Chinese today take pride in it. However, as many of us know, the facts point to the other direction.
We were on an airplane last month with hundreds of Chinese tourists traveling from Shanghai to Colombo, the capital of Sri Lanka. The group was so rowdy throughout the flight that it became a supersized nightmare. I felt like I was in an Asian night market filled with haggling customers. I have traveled a lot, but never once have I ever encountered such a large group of unruly and disorderly people.
The toilets were singularly filthy: People urinated onto the commode with the toilet seat down. Some passengers on the aisle seats refused to move to let those at window seats pass. The most annoying occurrence during the trip was cutting in line.
I tried to prevent a middle-aged burly woman from jumping the queue at a five-star restaurant. I told her in Chinese: “Line starts there.” Guess what? She just ignored me. There were two unruly tourists who even entered the server’s workstation trying to get drinks. When stopped by servers, they were puzzled, not knowing why.
There were many other mishaps during the tour: The tourists stooped to sniff food at buffet counters, talked in a condescending manner to Sri Lankan servers, refused to tip and took all the hot water from the container with large insulated bottles. Last but not least, they snatched and wasted foods like a swarm of locusts.
I heard one Sri Lankan butler whispering: “Why are there so many damn Chinese?” Unfortunately Sri Lanka needs tourist money to boost its economy. In return China wants to have close strategic ties with Sri Lanka.
I have no doubt that the behaviors of these “virtuous people” have cast genuinely negative images onto the people of Sri Lanka. How can these jumped-up vulgarians be virtuous at all? Chairman Mao simply used these people to serve his own personal gain.
On the way home from Shanghai to Taiwan, the flight was very quiet and I was back to the mode of tranquility and orderliness. It was like a tale of two cities. I felt the familiar environment of normalcy and security on the plane that I am used to.
I venture to say that a sizeable portion of people in China cannot be considered virtuous. Some are loud-mouthed simpletons; some are selfish and self-centered to the core. Some are patently dishonest and lying like a carpet. Red Guard-like behaviors are simply unfit for any modern society.
Chairman Mao must have been out of his mind or out to deliberately mislead his people in that poem. To claim that mainland China is brimming with 600 million virtuous people, mama mia. Give me a break. When pigs fly.
Richard Yang
New Taipei City
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom, sparked by the arrival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, took the world by storm. Within weeks, everyone was talking about it, trying it and had an opinion. It has transformed the way people live, work and think. The trend has only accelerated. The AI snowball continues to roll, growing larger and more influential across nearly every sector. Higher education has not been spared. Universities rushed to embrace this technological wave, eager to demonstrate that they are keeping up with the times. AI literacy is now presented as an essential skill, a key selling point to attract prospective students.