The Nikkei Shimbun has reported that the Journalism School of National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy in Ukraine, founded in 1615, has launched a fact-checking organization called “StopFake,” along with a Web site (stopfake.org). The organization collects evidence to expose misinformation disseminated by Russia, which is essentially at war with Ukraine, and shares the inside story with the world via independent media outlets.
The news report said that one Sunday morning the university’s television station aired the program Welcome to StopFake, which reports on news released by Russian media outlets, such as “Ukraine Becomes Drug Entry Point for Russia and Europe” and “European Court of Human Rights: Ukrainian Sailors Held by Russia not POWs.”
One by one, the organization examines the facts and scrutinizes relevant evidence, eventually debunking the fake news.
The Stopfake organization, consisting of 45 professors and graduate students, supervises 25 Russian media outlets on a regular basis and investigates suspicious information. It then uses TV and radio programs, as well as newspaper and other media outlets, to publicize details about the misinformation.
The organization releases the results of its investigations in as many as 13 languages.
Since its establishment in March 2014, the organization has exposed about 2,000 pieces of misinformation. StopFake accepts consultation requests from governments and media outlets around the world, and shares its experience.
Costing very little, but capable of causing social division, misinformation is a great bargain compared with the use of armed force.
The best preventive measures are to call for the public’s alertness to misinformation and cultivate society’s media literacy to enable the public to tell the difference between manipulated information and real news. By doing so, the threat of misinformation can be eliminated.
Students and professors in the Ukrainian university spare no effort to protect their own country. In comparison, a judge from the Nantou District Court dropped charges against a university student, surnamed You (游), who allegedly disseminated fake news on the Internet that arguably resulted in the suicide of former director-general of the Osaka branch of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office Su Chii-cherng (蘇啟誠), saying that the evidence presented by prosecutors “was insufficient to prove that social disturbance had occurred.”
The court dismissed the charges against You and delivered a not guilty verdict.
The two instances exemplify a lamentable difference in awareness of who the enemy is.
The Taipei Times published an article saying that the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology is recruiting experts for cyberwarfare and relevant research, with a monthly salary of up to NT$85,000 for employees with doctorates (“Chungshan Institute looking for cyberwarfare talent,” Jan. 1, page 3).
The news implies that the nation’s armed forces have mapped out preparatory measures for this new kind of warfare. Apart from the military sector, the government should not overlook the importance of boosting recruitment of information technology talent in the private sector, industries, academia and research institutes.
Perhaps the government should consider sending personnel to the Ukrainian university to learn from its experiences, holding discussions with domestic university research institutes, budgeting for relevant research and distilling resources to establish a Taiwanese version of the StopFake organization and augment the nation’s defensive capabilities for the new age.
Paul Liu is a retired Taiwan Power Co engineer.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose