Work cut out for Taiwan
The results of last month’s nine-in-one local elections and referendums attracted the attention of international media. What kind of a message has Taiwan sent out to the world?
Referendum 13, which asked voters whether they supported changing the name of the nation’s sport team at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics from the current “Chinese Taipei” to “Taiwan,” failed to meet the required threshold and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won an overwhelming victory.
International media interpreted this as a strong endorsement of the pro-China pan-blue camp by the electorate.
Additionally, in one report the BBC stated that Taiwanese voters refused to support same-sex marriage, which has dealt a blow to the island’s image as the vanguard of LGBTQ rights in Asia.
Whether or not we agree with the above interpretations of the results, we must not forget that Taiwan was the first nation in the Chinese-speaking world to elect a woman as its figurehead.
Furthermore, the implication of the Council of Grand Justices’ Interpretation No. 748 was a clear declaration of human rights values, which attracted commendation from international media and significantly elevated the nation’s image on the international stage.
If the results of the elections and referendums mean that international media have now lowered their assessment of Taiwan, this is something that the public must take collective responsibility for.
The results mean that Taiwan’s role within the cold war between the US and China has become both more awkward and more complex. It will also be even more difficult for Taiwan to fend off infiltration by Chinese forces.
Taiwan is caught in a political, economic and geographical vice. On the international stage its voice has been suppressed for far too long and so the nation lacks awareness of the need to fight for influence. It is always difficult for small nations to make their way in the world.
After the local elections and referendums, Taiwan should work hard to foster a more open society that is more compassionate and international. We must fight hard to obtain a positive voice in the international media so that the world’s impression of Taiwan is something that all Taiwanese can be proud of.
Lin Li-shan
New Taipei City
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS