According to the latest report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s main scientific authority on global warming, keeping global temperatures from rising more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels is a feasible goal. The IPCC’s stance represents a move in the direction of the kind of “radical realism” that many civil society actors have long advocated.
The IPCC does not bet on geo-engineering proposals — for example, deep-ocean sequestration of massive amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide, or “dimming the sun” by spraying the atmosphere with aerosols — to combat global warming. These largely theoretical solutions could have untold consequences for people and ecosystems, worsening not only the climate crisis, but also the other social and ecological crises we face.
Instead, the IPCC focuses on how we can avoid crossing the 1.5°C threshold in the first place. We must, it asserts, decarbonize the global economy immediately to ensure that global carbon dioxide emissions decline by about 45 percent by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.
Achieving this would require not just transforming economic activity, but also confronting destructive power dynamics and social inequalities.
Radical Realism for Climate Justice, a new anthology published by the Heinrich Boll Foundation, sets out strategies developed by international civil society and social movements to bring about such change.
In line with the IPCC’s core message, we urgently need a politically managed decline in fossil fuel production. This means putting a brake on oil, coal, and gas production and exploration.
As the group Oil Change International says, it does not mean abrupt or panicked action that could lead to a “sudden and dramatic shut-down of fossil fuel production, stranding assets, damaging economies, and harming workers and communities reliant on the energy sector.”
In building up the renewable energy sector, we should avoid replicating systems that have driven inequality and entrenched damaging power dynamics in the fossil fuel sector and other industries. This means replacing the market-based, investor-focused approach to energy production with one that treats energy as a public good, while engineering a shift toward social ownership and management of energy supplies.
Rooted in energy sovereignty and self-determination, this approach would spur faster decarbonization, including by weakening vested interests’ power to resist change. It would also facilitate the restructuring of energy systems to serve social and ecological needs.
Another system-level transformation that would facilitate major emissions reductions would be the creation of a zero-waste circular economy, whereby everything we produce and consume returns safely to nature or is recycled and reused.
Consider textiles production, which in 2015 generated greenhouse gas emissions totaling 1.2 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents.
These massive emissions — more than the combined total for all international flights and maritime shipping — reflect a “fast fashion” culture that produces garments as cheaply as possible, with the expectation of constant turnover in people’s wardrobes. If each garment were replaced half as often, the industry’s total greenhouse gas emissions would plummet by 44 percent.
A zero-waste circular economy for textiles would include not just more use of the clothes that are produced, but also improved recycling and repurposing of materials, to avoid emissions-producing waste disposal processes such as incineration. The biggest gains would come from the introduction of less wasteful production processes.
Important steps should also be taken regarding land use, encompassing agriculture and zoning changes.
As the international peasant’s movement La Via Campesina shows, the industrial food system’s emissions — including those from production, fertilizers, transport, processing, packaging, cooling and food waste, as well as from deforestation associated with the expansion of industrial agriculture — account for 44 to 57 percent of the global total.
A peasant agroecological production system based on food sovereignty, small-scale farming and agroecology could, La Via Campesina says, halve carbon emissions from agriculture within a few decades.
This approach is proven to work: small-scale farmers, peasants, fishers, indigenous communities, rural workers, women and youth already feed 70 percent of the world’s population, while using only 25 percent of its agricultural resources.
There is also a need to restore natural ecosystems that have been destroyed. Forests and peatlands, in particular, can sequester several hundred gigatonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Their restoration would protect not just biodiversity, but also local people, including the indigenous communities whose land-tenure rights have been systematically violated.
Retaining and expanding the land area under management by indigenous peoples and local communities could protect more than 1,000 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide worth of carbon stocks.
According to a report by the Climate, Land, Ambition, and Rights Alliance, ecosystem-based approaches in the land sector and agroecological changes to food production and consumption systems — including more local ownership — could deliver 13 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year in avoided emissions, and almost 10 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent annually in sequestered carbon by 2050.
The result would be 448 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide in cumulative removals by 2100 — about 10 times present global annual emissions.
Limiting global temperatures to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels is our best hope of containing the effects of a climate crisis born of historical injustices and deep-rooted inequities.
The only way to succeed would be to undertake a shift to a new socioeconomic system. This means abandoning the single-minded obsession with GDP growth — which has facilitated the proliferation of wasteful production and consumption patterns and fueled economic and social inequality and injustice — in favor of a public goods approach that serves genuinely to make people’s lives better.
Demanding such a transformation is not “naive” or “politically unfeasible.” It is radically realistic. It is the only way we can achieve social justice, while protecting our environment from devastating climate change.
Barbara Unmussig is president of the Heinrich Boll Foundation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
RSS