A few days ago, the Criminal Investigation Bureau’s Ninth Investigation Corps cracked a fraud case in which the alleged perpetrators used fake accounts to lure members of the public and then altered the status of the account to continue their marketing fraud.
Some of the fraudulent offers were NT$500 gasoline coupons, NT$500 Father’s Day gift coupons and steak house gift coupons for five people.
Although at first the victims only felt that they had been diddled, it was all about using Internet marketing companies to collect their personal information by first using fake accounts and illegally using company logos to gain people’s trust. After getting their information, the perpetrators resold it to customers who needed it.
In addition to contravening the Trademark Act (商標法), the illegal use of logos also resulted in fake news spreading all over the place. The apprehension of these users hiding behind fake Internet accounts is welcomed by the public, and also has the effect of fixing “broken windows” in line with the broken windows theory, thereby deterring the spread of fake news online.
Fake accounts and fake news do not only create problems for you and me; they can also destabilize democracy. For example, fake news created by fake accounts had an effect on the UK’s Brexit vote and the US’ 2016 presidential election. This is a by-product of the shortcomings of cross-border governance in the information era.
Due to the cross-border nature of the Internet and the convergence of the telecommunications, broadcasting, multimedia and information and communication technology industries, the UN World Summit on the Information Society has said that, in addition to privacy and data protection, fake news and false online information are becoming a new information security topic.
At a forum discussing Internet governance, representatives of many of the participating nations called for cross-sector cooperation: national governments, civic society and community groups working together to create specifications, rules and procedures regulating online usage.
On Aug. 21, Facebook announced that it had removed 652 accounts with ties to Russia and Iran trying to influence the US’ midterm elections and attempting to exert global political influence. On the same day, Twitter announced the removal of 284 accounts for “engaging in coordinated manipulation.” This makes it clear that the fight against fake news is focused on fake accounts.
The fight against fake online news is now an important strategy in global governance. Regardless of whether it is the US government working with information software and social media businesses to establish control mechanisms or the digital communications act that Germany is studying, the goal is to find ways to prevent the harm caused by fake accounts and information.
However, establishing a system capable of differentiating between true and false will involve press freedom and freedom of expression, both of which are core democratic values.
This means that the questions of how to establish ways to facilitate public participation and consultation, using an open data platform for government data, and building a self-managing Internet control system and how to connect that to a renewal of private information protection, communications secrecy, intellectual property rights protection and consumer protection legislation will be the next challenge for countries as they try to protect the legal interests of individuals, society and their nations.
Lin Shu-li is a doctoral student at Central Police University.
Translated by Julian Clegg and Perry Svensson
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats