It did not come as a surprise that former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — known for his fixation on his legacy — entrusted a foundation named after him to hold a forum to remind the public that it was the third anniversary of his historic meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
What was surprising was the message he tried to send Beijing through the forum on Wednesday.
Given the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) dwindling influence in politics, which has been exacerbated by the government’s ongoing efforts to recover assets the party acquired during its one-party rule, the Xi administration appears to have given up hope of relying on the KMT to further its agenda of unification.
The flagship annual forum between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has not been held since the previous one in Beijing in November 2016, a departure from the CCP’s practice of cozying up to the KMT when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is in power to make life more difficult for the governing party.
Against this backdrop, Ma proposed a new “three noes” policy, calling it the best option to maintain cross-strait peace. They are: no exclusion of the possibility of unification, no independence and no use of force.
It appears to be a slight revision of the “three noes” policy that he proposed in 2007 when he was running for president, pledging to maintain a cross-strait policy of “no unification, no independence and no use of force.”
The difference between the two policies might just be a few words, but in light of the speculation that Ma might take advantage of his resurgent popularity to make a run at a third presidential term, it could signal a drastic change in the KMT’s cross-strait policy — from supporting the “status quo” to being open to the idea of unification.
By saying that Taiwan should not rule out unification, Ma is telling the CCP that such an option is on the table and that its best chance of realizing its ultimate goal of a “unified China” is by betting on the KMT again.
Ma’s stance not only shows the party’s inability to see that China is an enemy and Taiwanese must unite to fend off its aggression, but also underscores his hypocrisy, as well as the KMT’s.
In October 2015, the KMT forced then-deputy legislative speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) to give up her presidential candidacy on the grounds that her support for unification ran counter to mainstream public opinion.
Moreover, given that Beijing has never publicly backed Ma’s story that the so-called “1992 consensus” includes a tacit agreement that each side is free to interpret what “one China” means, Ma’s compromise on the unification issue reeks of desperation and could make it even more difficult for the DPP administration to protect the nation from Beijing’s “one China” shackles.
It is a warning that voters should heed if they are thinking of teaching the DPP a lesson by voting in support of the KMT in the Nov. 24 nine-in-one elections. The consequences might be severe and long-lasting.
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
RSS