Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) has said that English should be made a second official language, while the teaching of the mother tongue Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) should be taught within the family. For this to be voiced by someone seeking to be mayor of a major city is cause for concern, as it demonstrates a lack of understanding of language education, as well as of international experience.
The idea of letting people practice their mother tongue at home might seem like a reasonable proposition; however, the reality is quite different.
One wonders whether Han understands how many of the world’s languages are now on the brink of disappearing. Could this have been due to a lack of families in which they are used?
Han would be right in thinking that mother tongues start within the family, but the family is no match for schools for the teaching of dominant languages.
When the KMT first occupied Taiwan, many elementary-school students could not speak Mandarin. In time, elementary-school students were able to speak Mandarin, but struggled to speak their native Taiwanese. Language learning takes place in schools, not at home.
If Han wants to run a city, he might take a leaf out of former premier Su Tseng-chang’s (蘇貞昌) book. Su knows that families alone cannot be relied on to teach a language; for that, schools are still king.
The reason Su is renowned as a champion of language education is simple: He was the first to push for teaching Taiwanese in schools, and he was successful in this endeavor. Unfortunately, he was unable to secure a second term as Pingtung County commissioner in 1993, losing to Wu Tse-yuan (伍澤元). As a result, his initiative of teaching Taiwanese in schools was abandoned.
Does Han know that nowhere in the world has any country adopted a foreign language as its official language unless it was forced upon it by a foreign colonial power?
The KMT can be regarded as a foreign colonial regime, not just because of the inequality it promotes between Chinese and Taiwanese, but also because of the way in which the Chinese linguistic and cultural system has been used to suppress Taiwanese culture, and how this has been manifest in schools as the loss of the Taiwanese language.
It also betrays a lack of knowledge of dealing with other countries. Not all major nations speak English and these non-English speaking countries have no problem operating within the international community. If anyone needs to speak English, they get English-language instruction.
When Taipower Co (Taipower) undertook the first major upgrade of the monitoring and control systems of the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門), it brought in more than 60 General Electric consultants from the US, with whom the Taiwanese engineers communicated in English. Those who needed English studied it themselves; those who did not had no need to.
It is not like all of Taipower’s personnel conversed with each other in English at all times.
When the KMT governed Taiwan it tried to eradicate Taiwanese culture, using state power to push Mandarin instead. Taiwanese reacted against this and have called for the promotion of Taiwanese, advocating for its adoption as an official language.
Han and his pro-China colleagues are resisting Taiwanese culture and calling for instituting English as a second official language instead, in a transparent attempt to prevent this from happening.
Chen Mao-hsiung is a retired National Sun Yat-sen University professor and chairman of the Society for the Promotion of Taiwanese Security.
Translated by Paul Cooper
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a