The governing principle of US President Donald Trump’s administration is total irresponsibility, a claim of innocence from a position of power, something which happens to be an old fascist trick. As we see in the president’s reactions to US right-wing terrorism, he will always claim victimhood for himself and shift blame to the actual victims.
As we see in the motivations of the terrorists themselves, and in the long history of fascism, this maneuver can lead to murder.
The Nazis claimed a monopoly on victimhood. Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (My Struggle) includes a lengthy pout about how Jews and other non-Germans made Hitler’s life as a young man in the Habsburg Monarchy difficult.
After stormtroopers attacked others in Germany in the early 1930s, they made a great fuss if one of their own was injured. The Horst Wessel Song, recalling a single Nazi who was killed, was on the lips of Germans who killed millions of people. World War II was for the Nazis’ self-defense against “global Jewry.”
The idea that the powerful must be coddled arose in a setting that recalls the US of today. The Habsburg Monarchy of Hitler’s youth was a multinational country with democratic institutions and a free press. Some Germans, members of the dominant nationality, felt threatened because others could vote and publish. Hitler was an extreme example of this kind of sentiment.
Today, some white Americans are similarly threatened by the presence of others in institutions they think of as their own. Among the targets of an accused pipe bomber were four women, five blacks and two Jews. Just as (some) Germans were the only serious national problem within the Habsburg Monarchy, so today are (some) white Americans the only serious threat to their own republic.
Hitler formulated his version of total irresponsibility after the disaster of World War I, which destroyed the Habsburg Monarchy and fragmented its German ally. He found an explanation for the disaster that spared the ego of the German nationalists who had supported it.
The world was a struggle among superior and inferior races, Hitler said.
If superior Germans were somehow defeated in a war, this only proved that an invisible power stood behind the visible facts: global Jewry.
According to Hitler, Jews inculcated ideas, such as that of individual rights, that drew people away from their natural bloodlust. The notion that Jews are responsible for civil rights or immigrant protection, one that seems to have motivated the mass shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is an example of this Hitlerian way of thinking.
As Jews are supposedly responsible for rights, they are blamed when people beyond the dominant group exercise rights. Because the spread of the norm of rights takes place in the mind, the only response, Hitler thought, was to remove Jews from the planet. The accused Pittsburgh murderer — who was quoted as saying “all Jews must die” — seems to have thought in just this way.
The attraction of the Nazi conspiracy-thinking is that we can feel like victims when we attack. Its vulnerability is that the world is full of facts. Hence Hitler’s hostility to journalism.
In the Germany of the early 1930s, the newspaper industry was suffering after a financial crisis. Hitler and other Nazis used the idea of the Luegenpresse (“lying press,” fake news”) to attack remaining journalists who were trying to report the facts.
In Germany and Austria today, the far right once more speaks of the Luegenpresse, in part because the US president has made the idea respectable. The extreme right in Germany and Austria knows perfectly well that “fake news” is American English for Luegenpresse.
In the US today, reporting was already in trouble for similar reasons before Trump, like Hitler, began to claim that the reporters who seek the facts are liars and enemies. Naturally, the president denies responsibility when people take him at his word and draw instead from the conspiracy-thinking that he himself spreads.
Trump blames the press for attempts to murder members of the press. He seizes the occasion, as always, to present himself as the true victim. The facts hurt his feelings. Trump and some of his supporters mount a strategy of deterrence by narcissism: If you note our debts to fascism, we will up the pitch of the whining.
Thus, Trump can base his rhetoric on the fascist idea of us and them, lead fascist chants at rallies, encourage his supporters to use violence, praise a politician who attacked a journalist, muse that former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton should be assassinated, denigrate the intelligence of African Americans, associate migrants with criminality, run an anti-Semitic advertisement, spread the Nazi trope of Jews as “globalists” and endorse the anti-Semitic idea that Jewish financier George Soros is responsible for political opposition — but he and his followers will puff chests and swell sinuses if anyone points this out.
If Trump is not a fascist, this is only in the precise sense that he is not even a fascist. He strikes a fascist pose, and then issues generic palliative remarks and denies responsibility for his words and actions. However, as total irresponsibility is a central part of the fascist tradition, it is perhaps best to give Trump his due credit as an innovator.
Timothy Snyder is a Levin professor of history at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more