Vehicles flying the People’s Republic of China national flag often appear outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei and, after conducting a pro-China demonstration, drive off into the sunset. It is also not uncommon to see China’s five-star red flag openly waved in the streets by a column of demonstrators in downtown Taipei.
Officials often do nothing apart from occasionally dispatching police officers to “uphold public order,” as the morale among the ruling and opposition parties sinks.
When I was studying at university many years ago, my fellow classmates were executed by firing squad simply for being suspected of holding left-leaning sympathies. Despite the passage of time, it is still extremely painful to think about it.
Today, Taiwan’s malevolent neighbor treats Taiwan as if it were a tributary nation. Beijing rides roughshod over Taiwanese public opinion, endlessly engaging in saber-rattling and issuing threats of invasion.
According to international law, Taiwan has the right to defend itself by conducting a pre-emptive strike under the principle of casus belli, whereby an act of provocation can be used as justification for war.
Taiwan does not have that ability, but this does not mean that it should allow Beijing to treat it as it wishes, humiliating Taiwan and playing havoc with its democratic freedoms.
The actions of China’s fifth column are unprecedented in the directness of their provocation and humiliation. Officials attempt to conceal their weakness and ineptitude by speaking platitudes about Taiwanese democracy, guaranteeing freedom of speech. They reason that because the actions of pro-China agitators in Taiwan fall within the remit of free speech, the government should not get involved, while the public looks on, speechless.
Officials and politicians underestimate the intelligence of the public who clearly see that their elected representatives’ mealymouthed responses are nothing more than a face-saving exercise aimed at deceiving the public through cowardly and shameful subterfuge.
Would any other advanced democracy allow the fifth column of a hostile nation to run amok inside its borders? Would the US and Japanese governments allow North Korean provocateurs to carry out flag-waving parades outside the White House in Washington or the Imperial Palace in Tokyo? Of course not.
The government should employ the principle of “reciprocal favorable treatment” in all its dealings with Beijing. This means that anything that Taiwanese are able to do in China, Chinese should also be free to do in Taiwan. In the same vein, anything that Taiwanese are unable to do in China, Chinese should not be able to do in Taiwan.
This would mean, for example, that Chinese in Taiwan would be free to spread propaganda in support of Taiwan’s unification with China, so long as Taiwanese in China were free to spread propaganda in support of Taiwanese independence or self-determination.
By the same logic, if Taiwanese cannot plant the Republic of China national flag on Chinese soil, then Chinese in Taiwan should not be able to do the same with the People’s Republic of China flag. This would be a common-sense approach against which nobody could mount a convincing argument.
Furthermore, it is worth reminding ourselves that if the government were to simply to ban the activities of China’s fifth column, and were it to strictly follow the principle of “reciprocal favorable treatment,” it would hardly be a pretext for Beijing to declare war on Taiwan.
The public simply cannot understand the government’s feeble posture toward China, and its provocateurs and sympathizers operating in Taiwan.
Taiwanese need clarity from politicians and government officials. Do not forget that internal disunity breeds weakness and invites attack from abroad.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Edward Jones
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS