When farmer Julimar Pansera purchased land in Brazil’s interior seven years ago, it was blanketed in tiers of fruit trees, twisted shrubs and the occasional palm standing tall in a thicket of undergrowth.
He mowed down most of that vegetation, set it ablaze and started planting soybeans. Over the past decade, he and others in the region have deforested an area larger than South Korea.
Permissive land-use policies and cheap farm acreage here have helped catapult Brazil into an agricultural superpower, the world’s largest exporter of soy, beef and chicken, and a major producer of pork and corn.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
The area has also lured farmers and ranchers away from the Amazon jungle, whose decline has spurred a global outcry to protect it.
The tradeoff is that while Brazil has slowed destruction of the renowned rainforest from its worst levels, it has put another vital ecological zone at risk: a vast tropical savanna that is home to 5 percent of species on the planet, environmentalists say.
Known as the cerrado, this habitat has lost more than 105,000km2 of native cover since 2008, according to government figures. That is 50 percent more than the deforestation seen during the same period in the Amazon, a biome more than three times larger.
Accounting for relative size, the cerrado is disappearing nearly four times faster than the rainforest.
The largest savanna in South America, the cerrado is a vital storehouse for carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas emitted from fossil fuels and deforestation that is warming the world’s atmosphere.
Brazilian officials have cited protection of native vegetation as critical to meeting its obligations under the Paris agreement on climate change, but scientists say the biome has reached a tipping point that could hamper Brazil’s efforts and worsen global warming.
By focusing on one problem, Brazil essentially created another, said Ane Alencar, science director of the non-profit Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM).
“There’s a high risk for the climate associated with this expansion,” Alencar said. “Limiting and calling attention to deforestation in the Amazon, in a way it forced the agribusiness industry to expand in the cerrado.”
The toll can already be seen in the region’s water resources. Streams and springs are filling with silt and drying up as vegetation around them vanishes. That in turn is weakening the headwaters of vital rivers flowing to the rest of the nation, scientists say.
The imperiled waterways include the Sao Francisco, Brazil’s longest river outside the Amazon, where water levels are hitting never-before-seen lows in the dry season.
“The removal of vegetation can lead a body of water to extinction,” said Liliana Pena Naval, an environmental engineering professor at the Federal University of Tocantins.
Wildlife is also under threat, including rare hyacinth macaws, maned wolves and jaguars that call the shrinking savanna home. So are thousands of plants, fish, insects and other creatures found nowhere else on Earth, many of which are only beginning to be studied.
“I compare it to the burning of the ancient Library of Alexandria,” University of Brasilia ecologist Mercedes Bustamante said. “You lose the accumulated evolutionary record of thousands of years that never can be recovered.”
Farmers see the cerrado’s development as critical to global food security and their nation’s prosperity.
Brazil’s agriculture sector grew a sizzling 13 percent last year, while the overall economy barely budged. The nation’s ability to keep producing new farmland cheaply has given it an edge over rivals and cemented its status as a vital supplier to the world’s tables.
“Imagine, if not for Brazil’s production, how much more hunger would there be,” Pansera said.
GREEN REVOLUTION
About the size of Mexico, straddling Brazil’s mid-section from its far western borders with Paraguay and stretching northeast toward the Atlantic coast, the cerrado has seen about half of its native forests and grasslands converted to farms, pastures and urban areas over the past 50 years.
Deforestation in the region has slowed from the early 2000s, when Brazil’s soy boom was gaining steam. Still, farmers continue to plow under vast stretches of the biome, propelled largely by Chinese demand for Brazilian meat and grain.
The Asian nation is Brazil’s No. 1 buyer of soybeans to fatten its own hogs and chickens. China is also a major purchaser of Brazilian pork, beef and poultry to satisfy the tastes of its increasingly affluent consumers.
Rising trade tensions between China and the US have only deepened that connection. Brazil’s soybean exports by value to China are up 18 percent through the first seven months of the year as Chinese buyers have canceled tens of millions of US dollars’ worth of contracts with US suppliers.
The trend bodes well for producers in the cerrado’s frontier region known as Matopiba, shorthand for the northeastern Brazilian states of Maranhao, Tocantins, Piaui and Bahia.
Land here is cheap. Virgin plots near Pansera in the state of Tocantins can be had for US$248 an acre on average, according to agribusiness consultancy Informa Economics IEG FNP. That compares with an average of US$3,080 per acre for already cleared farmland in the US.
Soy planting in Matopiba has more than doubled over the past decade.
Pansera, 50, is part of a wave of industrious transplants from southern Brazil who are remaking the region.
His formal education stopped at middle school, but he found land enough in the cerrado to match his big ambitions. He now presides over nearly 49km2 of manicured soy fields and has about 20 full-time workers on his payroll.
Pansera’s soybeans are to bring in an estimated profit of nearly 5 million reais (US$1.2 million) this year, most of which he plans to invest back into the farm.
Government policies have intentionally driven industrial-scale farming here. Short on farmland to feed its growing population, Brazil in the 1970s looked to its vast savanna, a region early explorers had dubbed cerrado (“closed”) because of its tangled woodlands.
State agriculture scientists developed fertilizers and additives to fix the acidic, nutrient-poor earth and created soybean strains that could thrive in the tropics. Arable land exploded. Within a decade, Brazil transformed itself from a food importer to a net exporter. By the 1990s, it was moving global commodities markets.
“Agriculture in the cerrado is what took Brazil to the next level,” Brazilian Minister of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply Blairo Maggi said.
Known as Brazil’s “Soy King,” Maggi is a billionaire whose family runs one of the largest private soybean operations in the world, much of it in the cerrado.
Growers are respectful of legally allowed limits on deforestation, Maggi said, adding that their “rational” occupation of the cerrado has helped Brazil’s economy.
Farmers have emerged as a powerful political force bent on keeping Brazil’s countryside open for business. Lawmakers in the nation’s largely rural, pro-agriculture voting bloc, who comprise more than 40 percent of the nation’s Congress, have led a rollback of environmental laws in recent years.
Those efforts include a 2012 loosening of Brazil’s landmark Forest Code that sets requirements for preserving native vegetation. The change reduced potential penalties for farmers, ranchers and loggers charged with past illegal deforestation, and made it easier for landowners to clear more of their holdings. Annual deforestation in the Amazon last year was up 52 percent from a record low in 2012.
Still, environmental protections there remain the most robust in Brazil. Rainforest farmers are required by law to preserve 80 percent of native vegetation on their plots, and global grain traders in 2006 voluntarily agreed to stop purchasing any soy harvested from newly deforested Amazon jungle areas.
As part of its obligations under the Paris agreement, the government pledged to eliminate illegal Amazon deforestation by 2030.
Brazil has made no similar push to preserve the cerrado, which has long been viewed as a resource to be developed.
Cerrado farmers are required to preserve as little as 20 percent of the natural cover, and up to 35 percent in areas neighboring the Amazon. Those who do not maximize use of their tracts risk having their land declared idle and subject to redistribution under a 1980 federal land-reform initiative aimed at assisting rural, low-income people, said Elvison Nunes Ramos, sustainability coordinator with the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply.
“The message being sent to the farmer is that he should not preserve, he should deforest,” Nunes Ramos said of the policy.
A spokesman for the Brazilian National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform, the government agency that verifies the use of the rural land, said its job is to ensure “the fulfillment of the social function of the property.”
WATER, WILDLIFE
Environmentalists say the cerrado’s wooded grasslands have failed to capture the public’s attention the way the Amazon’s lush jungles have.
People view the cerrado “just as bushes, twisted vegetation and shrubs,” Alencar said.
What many do not see is the connection between the soybean-fed meat on their plates and the steady decline of one of the world’s great carbon sinks, a bulwark against global warming, she said.
Plants here send roots deep into the earth to survive seasonal drought and fires, creating a vast underground network that some have likened to an upside-down forest.
Destruction of surface vegetation, and the resulting die-off of the life below, released 248 million tonnes of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere in 2016, according to estimates by the Climate Observatory, a Brazilian conservation group. That is about two-and-a-half times the annual tailpipe emissions from all cars in Brazil.
Watersheds are also hurting.
In Palmeirante, a rural municipality in the state of Tocantins, subsistence farmer Ronivon Matias de Andrade blames expanding mega-farms for damaging a community water source.
Dressed in faded shorts and flip flops, he showed a visitor the remains of what until recently had been a shady woodland: uprooted trees and freshly exposed earth pocked with heavy equipment tracks.
Stripped of its vegetation, sandy topsoil is filling a nearby creek and an adjoining freshwater pool where he and other rural families draw drinking water. He scooped up a murky handful in disgust.
“How many are being finished off in this manner in this state?” 43-year-old Andrade said.
Environmentalists say vanishing creeks like those in Palmeirante are threatening the nation’s water supply. Seemingly insignificant sources — tiny brooks, nameless rivulets — are vital building blocks supplying water to tributary streams that in turn feed some of Brazil’s largest rivers.
Of a dozen major water systems in Brazil, eight are born in the cerrado. They include the Sao Francisco, the nation’s fourth-largest river, which was once famed for its paddle-wheeled riverboats known as gaiolas.
Environmentalists say that artificial diversions, including agriculture and hydroelectric dams, have helped alter water levels to a degree that long stretches of the river are now unnavigable during the dry season.
Loss of native ground cover is also driving microclimate change in the region, they say. Reduced vegetation leads to higher ground temperatures and lower humidity, a recipe for less rainfall.
A study conducted at the University of Brasilia links deforestation to an 8.4 percent drop in precipitation from 1977 to 2010 in the cerrado.
Cerrado wildlife is under pressure as habitat shrinks. More than 300 species that dwell there are considered threatened with extinction, according to the government.
Among them are 44 rare types of “annual fish” unique to the cerrado, whose short lives begin with spring rains and end with the summer heat. Scientists suspect that increasing dry spells could be interrupting their delicate reproduction cycles.
Other creatures, including rheas — giant, ostrich-like birds — are to soon join the endangered species list if nothing is done to reverse the slide, University of Brasilia zoology professor Ricardo Machado said.
The birds’ numbers have plummeted due to loss of native ground cover critical to breeding and nesting, he said.
Machado worries that unique cerrado plants, insects and other creatures might vanish before scientists have an opportunity to identify them, much less study them.
“There is a universe to be discovered,” Machado said. “All attention is focused on the Amazon, no one speaks for the cerrado.”
SOY BOOM
That is beginning to change.
Dozens of groups, including Greenpeace, the WWF and IPAM, last year began pushing for large multinationals to protect the biome. In a document known as the Cerrado Manifesto, they called for immediate action to stop deforestation in the region.
More than 60 companies, including McDonalds, Unilever and Walmart, have signed on so far. The firms have agreed to support measures that would eliminate native vegetation loss in the cerrado from their supply chains.
However, in contrast to the 2006 Amazon soy moratorium, the Cerrado Manifesto did not commit signatories to halt purchases of farm products from newly deforested areas.
Walmart and Unilever said they are committed to achieving zero net deforestation in their supply chains by 2020, meaning any destruction in one region would be offset by recuperation of similar forest elsewhere.
Walmart said all its beef suppliers in the cerrado are monitored to ensure they do not contribute to deforestation there.
McDonalds did not respond to a request for comment.
Separately, the Netherlands-based Louis Dreyfus Co in June became the first major commodity trader to pledge to stop buying soy from newly deforested land specifically in the cerrado.
The company gave no timetable, but said it would work to establish a “realistic target date” to end deforestation in its cerrado supply chain.
Former Brazilian minister of environment Jose Sarney Filho, who recently left office to run for the Senate, has proposed an international effort to compensate landowners who preserve natural habitat.
He raised the issue in November last year at the global climate summit in Germany, but the effort has yet to attract major backers.
Meanwhile, Pansera sees big things ahead for his patch of the cerrado.
Supervising the harvest on his land earlier this year, he watched a pair of combines chew through rows of soybean plants. The giant machines stripped away the beans and spit them into empty grain trucks rolling just behind to catch the bounty.
He said there is no future without growth, and the frontier region of Matopiba is just getting started. He plans to plant an additional 180 hectares of soy next year on newly cleared land.
“There is still a large area to be opened,” Pansera said. “It will be one of the great centers of Brazilian agriculture.”
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS