What the president should do
When a baby is abused, he or she will cry or struggle until the abuse is stopped.
Unfortunately, when Taiwan is abused, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) still insists on her “status quo” policy and accepts the newly imposed “status quo.” She has done nothing in response to abuse against the country she is responsible for.
If this continues, Taiwan will have no status or will disappear completely.
Many Taiwanese voted for Tsai as president, hoping that she would become an “Iron Lady” like former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher.
Tsai has a graduate-school education in England and speaks English with a British accent.
Although Tsai has implemented some brave, unprecedented reforms, these cannot prevent her approval rating from falling.
A recent poll showed her popularity standing for the 2020 presidential election at No. 5.
This situation is not healthy for Tsai herself, the Democratic Progress Party, or Taiwan as a country, unless something is done without further delay.
There are several things that Tsai and her administration can do as a start to reverse the situation:
Stop calling China “Mainland China,” as this implies the antonymic term “Taiwan, China.”
Sign the petitions to change “Chinese Taipei” to “Taiwan” for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, as our motherland is Taiwan.
Stop using China Airlines, which is easily confused with China Air.
Likewise, the names People’s Republic of China and Republic of China are extremely confusing.
Taiwan should not steal China’s name and China should not impose its name on Taiwan.
Apply for UN General Assembly membership as Taiwan, as the UN is a universal organization and Taiwan is a member of the world village.
Normalize Taiwan as a country, like nearly 200 others.
A Taiwanese proverb says: “If you are timid, you will never win” (驚驚不會得等). This proverb applies to everyone, including a president.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
An objective comparison?
It may not be accurate for Tsai Chuo-li to sum up in his letter: “And yet sections of the media and certain politicians insisted on making a meal out of the armored-vehicle thing” (Letter, Aug. 29, page 8). I do not find such comments to be objective. On the contrary, I find it to be a one-sided subjective observation.
I was not at all following the news. I only knew President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was attacked strongly by the media and talk-show guests recently for traveling to the disaster areas in southern Taiwan in an armored vehicle.
However, by chance, I was watching television one night, and although I do not recall whether it was a talk or news show, I did see a footage of the president in an armored vehicle that was videotaped by a “civilian.”
My own subjective thought would be I totally agree that visiting the disaster-hit area most efficiently and safely, the Presidential Office made a sound choice.
However, the following morning I saw a news report which showed a photo of two camera-crew members standing right next to the president (one had a camera ready to take a photo from the best angle) in that small open space, while she waved and smiled to victims standing in at least ankle-deep water.
Such a scene truly reflected no empathy or “the soft part” of our president’s heart.
I do understand that in his letter, Tsai Chuo-li intended to compare the heavy rains that struck Japan and Taiwan.
I know nothing about weather or floods, and maybe I need to research further on whether Akita and Hiroshima have always suffered flood crises whenever they are hit by heavy rainfall.
On the other hand, I do know Kaohsiung suffered not just this once, but several times, and the central government has invested heavily with large sums of taxpayer money to improve the situation.
It is simply a shame that God, who is the only one capable to be in control of the whole universe, did not spare our cities in the south from such severe natural disasters.
May we stay objective.
Linda Lai
Taipei
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which